libstdc++/553

[pme@gcc.gnu.org]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/553; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: pme@gcc.gnu.org
To: agg1@cs.wustl.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, pme@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/553
Date: 30 Jan 2001 23:19:11 -0000

 Synopsis: Call to sort () results in segfault
 
 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
 State-Changed-By: pme
 State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 30 15:19:11 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Not a library bug.  Private communication with the
     submitter confirms that using >= instead of > in the
     comparison functor (and thus failing to meet the strict
     weak ordering requirement) causes the problem.  Although a
     SEGV (!) still seems harsh, there's nothing the library can
     do.  Even the concept_checks mechanism can't catch this
     sort of thing.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=553&database=gcc