java/1455: gcjh barfs on legal java name usage
ashe@qms.com
ashe@qms.com
Wed Dec 20 12:28:00 GMT 2000
>Number: 1455
>Category: java
>Synopsis: gcjh barfs on legal java name usage
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apbianco
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed Dec 20 12:20:08 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified: Thu Nov 4 21:16:00 PST 1999
>Originator: Steven Ashe
>Release: 2.95.1 and later
>Organization:
>Environment:
linux rh6.0
>Description:
run this legal Java through gcjh:
class Foo {
public static int F;
public void F() {
}
}
result is:
static field has same name as method
>How-To-Repeat:
see "Description"
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Formerly PR gcj/75
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com>
To: Java Gnats Server <java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Cc:
Subject: gcj/75
Date: 04 Nov 1999 22:20:24 -0700
Thanks for the report. This is a known bug. The problem is that C++
can't have a method and a field with the same name.
For now, the workaround is "don't do that".
Later, we'd like to change the C++ compiler so we can have an
attribute which will effectively rename one of the fields. This
attribute will also be useful when we want to represent fields with
non-ASCII characters in their names (there might be another way to do
that already, but I haven't studied UCN's enough to know if they are
the right solution for us).
Tom
>Unformatted:
More information about the Gcc-prs
mailing list