[PATCH] c++: Fix bogus warnings about ignored annotations [PR114409]
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Fri Mar 22 08:08:42 GMT 2024
Hi!
The middle-end warns about the ANNOTATE_EXPR added for while/for loops
if they declare a var inside of the loop condition.
This is because the assumption is that ANNOTATE_EXPR argument is used
immediately in a COND_EXPR (later GIMPLE_COND), but simplify_loop_decl_cond
wraps the ANNOTATE_EXPR inside of a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, so it no longer
holds.
The following patch fixes that by adding the TRUTH_NOT_EXPR inside of the
ANNOTATE_EXPR argument if any.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Note, the PR is mostly about ICE with the annotations used in a template,
this patch doesn't change anything on that and I really don't know what
should be done in that case.
2024-03-22 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/114409
* semantics.cc (simplify_loop_decl_cond): Use cp_build_unary_op with
TRUTH_NOT_EXPR on ANNOTATE_EXPR argument (if any) rather than
ANNOTATE_EXPR itself.
* g++.dg/ext/pr114409.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/semantics.cc.jj 2024-03-01 17:27:58.862888609 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/semantics.cc 2024-03-21 15:24:57.296857864 +0100
@@ -799,7 +799,11 @@ simplify_loop_decl_cond (tree *cond_p, t
*cond_p = boolean_true_node;
if_stmt = begin_if_stmt ();
- cond = cp_build_unary_op (TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, cond, false, tf_warning_or_error);
+ cond_p = &cond;
+ while (TREE_CODE (*cond_p) == ANNOTATE_EXPR)
+ cond_p = &TREE_OPERAND (*cond_p, 0);
+ *cond_p = cp_build_unary_op (TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, *cond_p, false,
+ tf_warning_or_error);
finish_if_stmt_cond (cond, if_stmt);
finish_break_stmt ();
finish_then_clause (if_stmt);
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr114409.C.jj 2024-03-21 15:27:44.077661090 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr114409.C 2024-03-21 15:27:15.331039726 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// PR c++/114409
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -Wall" }
+
+void qux (int);
+int foo (int);
+
+void
+bar (int x)
+{
+ #pragma GCC novector
+ while (int y = foo (x)) // { dg-bogus "ignoring loop annotation" }
+ qux (y);
+}
+
+void
+baz (int x)
+{
+ #pragma GCC novector
+ for (; int y = foo (x); ) // { dg-bogus "ignoring loop annotation" }
+ qux (y);
+}
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list