[PATCH v1] RISC-V: Revert RVV wv instructions overlap and xfail tests

[Patrick O'Neill]

Hi Pan,

>> I'm not sure I'm following.  Did we miss something that should have been
>> covered?  Like only an overlap on the srcs but not the dest?
>> Are there testcases that fail?  If so we should definitely have one.
Can you give some additional information on why these reverts are needed?
+1 to the request for a failing testcase if there is one.Patrick
>> If something is broken then indeed we should revert it.
> Yes, we may need to support these in gcc-15.
>
>> ... why not just revert everything and xfail all the tests in a
>> follow up?  Your patch is essentially a revert but doesn't look like
>> it.  I'd rather we let a revert be a revert and adjust the tests
>> separately so it becomes clear.
> Sure, will revert b3b2799b872 and then file the patch for the xfail tests.
>
> Pan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20240422/3d89625b/attachment.htm>