[PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Optimize switch with sign-extended index.

Lulu Cheng chenglulu@loongson.cn
Sat Sep 2 06:24:33 GMT 2023


The patch refers to the submission of RISCV
7bbce9b50302959286381d9177818642bceaf301.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_extend_comparands):
	In unsigned QImode test, check for sign extended subreg and/or
	constant operands, and do a sign extend in that case.
	* config/loongarch/loongarch.md (TARGET_64BIT): Define
	template cbranchqi4.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc              | 14 ++++++++++++--
 gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md              |  8 ++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
index c72229cad87..7e300c826cf 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
@@ -4228,8 +4228,18 @@ loongarch_extend_comparands (rtx_code code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1)
   /* Comparisons consider all XLEN bits, so extend sub-XLEN values.  */
   if (GET_MODE_SIZE (word_mode) > GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (*op0)))
     {
-      /* TODO: checkout It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values.  */
-      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code && GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode)
+      /* It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values.  But not if the
+	 first operand has already been sign-extended, and the second one is
+	 is a constant or has already been sign-extended also.  */
+      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code
+	  && (GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode
+	      && ! (GET_CODE (*op0) == SUBREG
+		    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op0)
+		    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op0)
+		    && (CONST_INT_P (*op1)
+			|| (GET_CODE (*op1) == SUBREG
+			    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op1)
+			    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op1))))))
 	{
 	  *op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, *op0);
 	  if (CONST_INT_P (*op1))
diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
index b37e070660f..1bb4e461b38 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
@@ -2733,11 +2733,15 @@ (define_insn "*branch_equality<mode>_inverted"
   [(set_attr "type" "branch")])
 
 
+;; Branches operate on XLEN-sized quantities, but for LoongArch64 we accept
+;; QImode values so we can force zero-extension.
+(define_mode_iterator BR [(QI "TARGET_64BIT") SI (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
+
 (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
   [(set (pc)
 	(if_then_else (match_operator 0 "comparison_operator"
-			[(match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand")
-			 (match_operand:GPR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
+			[(match_operand:BR 1 "register_operand")
+			 (match_operand:BR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
 		      (label_ref (match_operand 3 ""))
 		      (pc)))]
   ""
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..dd192fd497f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=loongarch64 -mabi=lp64d" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bstrpick" } } */
+
+/* Test for loongarch_extend_comparands patch.  */
+extern void asdf (int);
+void
+foo (signed char x) {
+    switch (x) {
+      case 0: asdf (10); break;
+      case 1: asdf (11); break;
+      case 2: asdf (12); break;
+      case 3: asdf (13); break;
+      case 4: asdf (14); break;
+    }
+}
-- 
2.31.1



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list