[PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement
Arsen Arsenović
arsen@aarsen.me
Mon May 29 17:26:07 GMT 2023
Hi,
NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> writes:
> Can you include texinfo in a top-level directory and have it built with the
> build, like you can with dejagnu? That's generally a decent path for
> building new gcc on older systems.
Note that the Texinfo requirement wasn't bumped, so nothing changed in
this regard, however, I believe that this is already done, as I see the
following in Makefile.def:
host_modules= { module= texinfo; no_install= true; };
(... and some relevant logic in configure.ac)
I'm not a fan of building dependencies in-tree, but I can see the
usefulness; I believe a superior solution would be one that adds .info
(et al.) files to all generated tarballs (including snapshots), hence
eliminating any extra deps anyway. These files aren't system-specific,
after all, as they are neither code nor conditionally compiled.
This is also assumed practice in other packages.
Have a lovely day.
--
Arsen Arsenović
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20230529/588bfb96/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list