Re: [PATCH v8] RISC-V: Add the 'zfa' extension, version 0.2.
jinma
jinma@linux.alibaba.com
Sat May 6 12:53:09 GMT 2023
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md b/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md
> > > index 9b767038452..c81b08e3cc5 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md
> > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/iterators.md
> > > @@ -288,3 +288,8 @@ (define_int_iterator QUIET_COMPARISON [UNSPEC_FLT_QUIET UNSPEC_FLE_QUIET])
> > > (define_int_attr quiet_pattern [(UNSPEC_FLT_QUIET "lt") (UNSPEC_FLE_QUIET "le")])
> > > (define_int_attr QUIET_PATTERN [(UNSPEC_FLT_QUIET "LT") (UNSPEC_FLE_QUIET "LE")])
> > >
> > > +(define_int_iterator ROUND [UNSPEC_ROUND UNSPEC_FLOOR UNSPEC_CEIL UNSPEC_BTRUNC UNSPEC_ROUNDEVEN UNSPEC_NEARBYINT])
> > > +(define_int_attr round_pattern [(UNSPEC_ROUND "round") (UNSPEC_FLOOR "floor") (UNSPEC_CEIL "ceil")
> > > + (UNSPEC_BTRUNC "btrunc") (UNSPEC_ROUNDEVEN "roundeven") (UNSPEC_NEARBYINT "nearbyint")])
> > > +(define_int_attr round_rm [(UNSPEC_ROUND "rmm") (UNSPEC_FLOOR "rdn") (UNSPEC_CEIL "rup")
> > > + (UNSPEC_BTRUNC "rtz") (UNSPEC_ROUNDEVEN "rne") (UNSPEC_NEARBYINT "dyn")])
> > Do we really need to use unspecs for all these cases? I would expect
> > some correspond to the trunc, round, ceil, nearbyint, etc well known RTX
> > codes.
> >
> > In general, we should try to avoid unspecs when there is a clear
> > semantic match between the instruction and GCC's RTX opcodes. So please
> > review the existing RTX code semantics to see if any match the new
> > instructions. If there are matches, use those RTX codes rather than
> > UNSPECs.
>
> I'll try, thanks.
I encountered some confusion about this. I checked gcc's documents and
found no RTX codes that can correspond to round, ceil, nearbyint, etc.
Only "(fix:m x)" seems to correspond to trunc, which can be expressed
as rounding towards zero, while others have not yet been found.
In addition, I found that other architectures also seem to adopt the
unspecs for all these cases on the latest master branch.
arm: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/1dd4fe1fd892458ce29f15f3ca95125a11b2534f#diff-159a39276c509272adfaeef91c2110f54f65c38f7fd1ab2f1e750af0a7f86377R1251
rs6000: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/7042fe5ef83ff0585eb91144817105f26d566d4c#diff-1a2d4976d867ead4556899cab1dbb39f5069574276e06a2976fb62b771ece2e3R6995
i386: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/3e8c4b925a9825fdb8c81f47b621f63108894362#diff-f00b14a8846eb6aaeb981077e36ac3668160d7dabb490beeb1f62792afa83281R23332
Can you give me some advice?
> > > @@ -1580,6 +1609,26 @@ (define_insn "l<rint_pattern><ANYF:mode><GPR:mode>2"
> > > [(set_attr "type" "fcvt")
> > > (set_attr "mode" "<ANYF:MODE>")])
> > >
> > > +(define_insn "<round_pattern><ANYF:mode>2"
> > > + [(set (match_operand:ANYF 0 "register_operand" "=f")
> > > + (unspec:ANYF
> > > + [(match_operand:ANYF 1 "register_operand" " f")]
> > > + ROUND))]
> > > + "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_ZFA"
> > > + "fround.<ANYF:fmt>\t%0,%1,<round_rm>"
> > > + [(set_attr "type" "fcvt")
> > > + (set_attr "mode" "<ANYF:MODE>")])
> > > +
> > > +(define_insn "rint<ANYF:mode>2"
> > > + [(set (match_operand:ANYF 0 "register_operand" "=f")
> > > + (unspec:ANYF
> > > + [(match_operand:ANYF 1 "register_operand" " f")]
> > > + UNSPEC_RINT))]
> > > + "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_ZFA"
> > > + "froundnx.<ANYF:fmt>\t%0,%1"
> > > + [(set_attr "type" "fcvt")
> > > + (set_attr "mode" "<ANYF:MODE>")])
> > Please review the existing RTX codes and their semantics in the
> > internals manual and if any of the new instructions match those existing
> > primitives, implement them using those RTX codes rather than with an UNSPEC.
> >
>
> I'll try, thanks.
>
thanks.
Jin Ma
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list