[PATCH] c++: End lifetime of objects in constexpr after destructor call [PR71093]

[Jason Merrill]

On 12/11/23 14:21, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:17:22PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 11.12.2023 um 20:12 schrieb Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>:
>>> Maybe something like this?  Or shall we write out the names like CLOBBER_OBJECT_START, CLOBBER_STORAGE_END, etc?
>>
>> Yeah, the abbreviations look a bit confusing so spelling it out would be better
> 
> What about pretty-print, should we keep
> 
>    pp_string (pp, "(eol)");
> 
> or use the new, more specific description?

I think we tend toward terseness in pretty-print, though I don't feel 
strongly about it at all.

But we should handle the other cases as well.

So, how about:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-tree-add-to-clobber_kind.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 8821 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20231211/578e0caf/attachment.bin>