[PATCH] top-level: Fix comment about --enable-libstdcxx in configure

Jonathan Wakely jwakely@redhat.com
Mon Mar 14 13:13:54 GMT 2022


Pushed to trunk now.

On 11/03/22 18:38 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>I'm going to push this as obvious, but do I need to do anything special
>to sync it with binutils, or will that happen next time somebody needs a
>proper fix?
>
>-- >8 --
>
>The custom option for enabling/disabling libstdc++ is not spelled the
>same as the directory name:
>
>AC_ARG_ENABLE(libstdcxx,
>AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-libstdcxx],
>  [do not build libstdc++-v3 directory])
>
>The comment referring to it later use the wrong name.
>
>ChangeLog:
>
>	* configure.ac: Fix incorrect option in comment.
>	* configure: Regenerate.
>---
> configure    | 2 +-
> configure.ac | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/configure b/configure
>index 9c2d7df1bb2..f7e0fa46c9c 100755
>--- a/configure
>+++ b/configure
>@@ -3390,7 +3390,7 @@ case "${target}" in
> esac
>
> # Disable libstdc++-v3 for some systems.
>-# Allow user to override this if they pass --enable-libstdc++-v3
>+# Allow user to override this if they pass --enable-libstdcxx
> if test "${ENABLE_LIBSTDCXX}" = "default" ; then
>   case "${target}" in
>     *-*-vxworks*)
>diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>index 68cc5cc31fe..434b1a267a4 100644
>--- a/configure.ac
>+++ b/configure.ac
>@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ case "${target}" in
> esac
>
> # Disable libstdc++-v3 for some systems.
>-# Allow user to override this if they pass --enable-libstdc++-v3
>+# Allow user to override this if they pass --enable-libstdcxx
> if test "${ENABLE_LIBSTDCXX}" = "default" ; then
>   case "${target}" in
>     *-*-vxworks*)



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list