[PATCH] middle-end/102587 - avoid auto-init for VLA vectors
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Tue Oct 5 06:25:37 GMT 2021
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > On October 4, 2021 7:00:10 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> I have several questions on this fix:
> >>
> >> 1. This fix avoided expanding “.DEFERRED_INIT” when !tree_fits_uhwi_p (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (var_type)).
> >> As a result, this call to .DEFERRED_INIT will NOT be expanded at all.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Then, should we exclude such auto init during gimplification phase?
No, we do want to and can handle such variables just fine.
> >
> >> Then not expanding .DEFERRED_INIT in RTL expanding phase will trigger more issues in later RTL phases, this looks not correct to me. (Actually, with is the patch, this testing case still failed in a later RTL stage).
> >>
> >> So, If we really want to avoid auto-init for VLA vectors, we should not add call to .DEFERRED_INIT in gimplification phase at all.
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. For the added .DEFERRED_INIT:
> >>
> >> __SVFloat64_t f64;
> >>
> >> f64 = .DEFERRED_INIT (POLY_INT_CST [16, 16], 2, 0);
> >>
> >> What does “POLY_INT_CST[16,16]” mean? Is this a constant size? If YES, what’s the value of it? If Not, can we use “memset” to expand it?
> >
> > When the target is a register memset doesn't work. I'm not sure the memset expansion path will work as-is either for aggregates with vla parts -
>
> Stupid question here: what does POLY_INT_CST[16,16] mean? It’s not a constant?
It's 16 * <vector-factor> where the factor is determined by the hardware
implementation but fixed throughout the programs lifetime. You could
think of the POLY_INT_CST expanding to a multiplication of 16 by a special
hardware register.
For vector types the zero-init could be done using build_zero_cst and
the expand_assignment path. Also the memset path should just work
as well.
It's the pattern init that's a bit more complicated but I'm sure
Richard will sort that out.
Note TYPE_SIZE_UNIT will honor tree_fits_poly_uint64_p but for the
pattern init we'd have to repeat the constant and maybe there's
a clever way to do this repeating just the single pattern byte.
But as said...
> > but I'll leave that to Richard S. to sort out.
^^^
Richard.
>
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Qing
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 3:57 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This avoids ICEing for VLA vector auto-init by not initializing.
> >>>
> >>> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
> >>>
> >>> 2021-10-04 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> >>>
> >>> PR middle-end/102587
> >>> * internal-fn.c (expand_DEFERRED_INIT): Guard register
> >>> initialization path an avoid initializing VLA registers
> >>> with it.
> >>>
> >>> * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-1.c: New testcase.
> >>> * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-2.c: Likewise.
> >>> ---
> >>> gcc/internal-fn.c | 3 ++-
> >>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-1.c | 4 ++++
> >>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-2.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-1.c
> >>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-2.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.c b/gcc/internal-fn.c
> >>> index 8312d08aab2..ef5dc90db56 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.c
> >>> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.c
> >>> @@ -3035,7 +3035,8 @@ expand_DEFERRED_INIT (internal_fn, gcall *stmt)
> >>> /* Expand this memset call. */
> >>> expand_builtin_memset (m_call, NULL_RTX, TYPE_MODE (var_type));
> >>> }
> >>> - else
> >>> + /* ??? Deal with poly-int sized registers. */
> >>> + else if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (var_type)))
> >>> {
> >>> /* If this variable is in a register, use expand_assignment might
> >>> generate better code. */
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-1.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 00000000000..2b9a68b0b59
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-1.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> >>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> >>> +/* { dg-options "-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero" } */
> >>> +
> >>> +void foo() { __SVFloat64_t f64; }
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-2.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 00000000000..4cdb9056002
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr102587-2.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> >>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> >>> +/* { dg-options "-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern" } */
> >>> +
> >>> +void foo() { __SVFloat64_t f64; }
> >>> --
> >>> 2.31.1
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list