[PATCH] Remove dead code.

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 15:00:37 GMT 2021


On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:44 AM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On 11/12/21 15:41, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>>> This fixes issue reported in the PR.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ready to be installed?
> >>>> I'm not sure.  liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right
> >>>> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothing
> >>>> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed away
> >>>> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix it in
> >>>> their source and update from that.
> >>>> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream.
> >>> I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the case that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code.
> >>>
> >>> jeff
> >>
> >> @H.J. ?
> >>
> >
> > We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12.  We will remove all traces of
> > MIC offload in GCC 13.
>
> I see. So do you want the patch to be installed or not?
>

I prefer to leave it alone and close the PR with WONTFIX.

-- 
H.J.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list