[PATCH] arm: Auto-vectorization for MVE: vaddv
Christophe Lyon
christophe.lyon@linaro.org
Wed May 26 14:40:25 GMT 2021
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 11:32, Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> writes:
> > This patch adds support for the reduc_plus_scal optab with MVE, which
> > maps to the vaddv instruction.
> >
> > It moves the reduc_plus_scal_<mode> expander from neon.md to
> > vec-common.md and adds support for MVE to it.
> >
> > Since vaddv uses a 32-bits accumulator, we have to truncate it's
> > result.
> >
> > For instance:
> > int32_t test__s8x16 (int8_t *a) {
> > int i;
> > int8_t result = 0;
> > for (i=0; i<16; i++) {
> > result += a[i];
> > }
> > return result;
> > }
> > is compiled into:
> > vldrb.8 q3, [r0]
> > vaddv.s8 r0, q3
> > sxtb r0, r0
> > bx lr
> >
> > If we used uint8_t instead of int8_t, we still use vaddv.s8 r0, q3,
> > but truncate with uxtb r0, r0.
> >
> > 2021-05-25 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> >
> > gcc/
> > * config/arm/mve.md (mve_vaddvq_<supf><mode>): Prefix with '@'.
> > * config/arm/neon.md (reduc_plus_scal_<mode>): Move to ..
> > * config/arm/vec-common.md: .. here. Add support for MVE.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > * gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vaddv-1.c: New test.
> > ---
> > gcc/config/arm/mve.md | 2 +-
> > gcc/config/arm/neon.md | 13 ----------
> > gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vaddv-1.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vaddv-1.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
> > index 133ebe93cf3..0a6ba80c99d 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
> > @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ (define_insn "mve_vclsq_s<mode>"
> > ;;
> > ;; [vaddvq_s, vaddvq_u])
> > ;;
> > -(define_insn "mve_vaddvq_<supf><mode>"
> > +(define_insn "@mve_vaddvq_<supf><mode>"
> > [
> > (set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=Te")
> > (unspec:SI [(match_operand:MVE_2 1 "s_register_operand" "w")]
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> > index 977adef5490..6a6573317cf 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> > @@ -1161,19 +1161,6 @@ (define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_<mode>"
> > DONE;
> > })
> >
> > -(define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_<mode>"
> > - [(match_operand:<V_elem> 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
> > - (match_operand:VQ 1 "s_register_operand")]
> > - "ARM_HAVE_NEON_<MODE>_ARITH && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
> > -{
> > - rtx step1 = gen_reg_rtx (<V_HALF>mode);
> > -
> > - emit_insn (gen_quad_halves_plus<mode> (step1, operands[1]));
> > - emit_insn (gen_reduc_plus_scal_<V_half> (operands[0], step1));
> > -
> > - DONE;
> > -})
> > -
> > (define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_v2di"
> > [(match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
> > (match_operand:V2DI 1 "s_register_operand")]
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
> > index e8b2901b006..cc136e2865f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
> > @@ -539,3 +539,29 @@ (define_expand "vec_store_lanesxi<mode>"
> > emit_insn (gen_mve_vst4q<mode> (operands[0], operands[1]));
> > DONE;
> > })
> > +
> > +(define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_<mode>"
> > + [(match_operand:<V_elem> 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
> > + (match_operand:VQ 1 "s_register_operand")]
> > + "ARM_HAVE_NEON_<MODE>_ARITH || (TARGET_HAVE_MVE && <MODE>mode != V4SFmode)
> > + && !TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT
> > + && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
>
> This might be better as:
>
> "ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH
> && !(TARGET_HAVE_MVE && FLOAT_MODE_P (<MODE>mode))
> && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
>
> just in case the iterator gets expanded for Neon in future.
> The TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT test shouldn't be needed.
Indeed. I got used to adding it after several bug reports related to
my previous MVE patches when using iwmmxt...
>
> > +{
> > + if (TARGET_NEON)
> > + {
> > + rtx step1 = gen_reg_rtx (<V_HALF>mode);
> > +
> > + emit_insn (gen_quad_halves_plus<mode> (step1, operands[1]));
> > + emit_insn (gen_reduc_plus_scal_<V_half> (operands[0], step1));
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + /* vaddv generates a 32 bits accumulator. */
> > + rtx op0 = gen_reg_rtx (SImode);
> > +
> > + emit_insn (gen_mve_vaddvq (VADDVQ_S, <MODE>mode, op0, operands[1]));
> > + emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (operands[0], gen_rtx_SUBREG (<V_elem>mode, op0, 0)));
>
> This last line should be:
>
> emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_lowpart (<V_elem>mode, op0));
>
> OK with those changes, thanks.
Thanks, pushed.
>
> Richard
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list