[PATCH 8/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in Objective-C
Iain Sandoe
idsandoe@googlemail.com
Tue May 25 14:01:33 GMT 2021
Hi Martin
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> The attached patch replaces the uses of TREE_NO_WARNING in
> the Objective-C front end.
> <gcc-no-warning-objc.diff>
I’ve been gradually trying to improve/add locations in the ObjC stuff.
To that end, I wonder if it might be worth considering always supplying
the intended masked warning (rather than omitting this when the node
currently has no location). I guess that would mean that the setter/getter
would need to determine if there was some suitable location (more work
but better abstraction).
This would mean that an improvement/addition to location would automatically
gain the improvement in masked warnings.
This is not an objection (the patch is OK for ObjC as is) .. just a question,
thanks
Iain
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list