[PATCH 8/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in Objective-C

[Iain Sandoe]

Hi Martin

Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> The attached patch replaces the uses of TREE_NO_WARNING in
> the Objective-C front end.
> <gcc-no-warning-objc.diff>

I’ve been gradually trying to improve/add locations in the ObjC stuff.

To that end, I wonder if it might be worth considering always supplying
the intended masked warning (rather than omitting this when the node
currently has no location).  I guess that would mean that the setter/getter
would need to determine if there was some suitable location (more work
but better abstraction).

This would mean that an improvement/addition to location would automatically
gain the improvement in masked warnings.

This is not an objection (the patch is OK for ObjC as is) .. just a question,

thanks
Iain