[PATCH] phiopt: Optimize (x <=> y) cmp z [PR94589]

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Fri May 14 17:26:39 GMT 2021


On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 09:42:41PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> We can probably do it in 2 steps, first something like
> 
> (for cmp (eq ne)
>  (simplify
>   (cmp (bit_and:c @0 @1) @0)
>   (cmp (@0 (bit_not! @1)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })))
> 
> to get rid of the double use, and then simplify X&C==0 to X<=~C if C is a
> mask 111...000 (I thought we already had a function to detect such masks, or
> the 000...111, but I can't find them anymore).
> 
> I agree that the comparison seems preferable, although if X is signed, the
> way GIMPLE represents types will add an inconvenient cast. And I think VRP
> already manages to use the bit test to derive a range.

I've tried the second step, but it unfortunately regresses
+FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/propbits-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "fail_test"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-42.c scan-tree-dump-not ivcanon "under assumptions "
so maybe it is better to keep these cases as the users wrote them.

So posting this patch just for archival purposes.

2021-05-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/94589
	* match.pd ((X & (-1 << N)) == 0 -> X <= (1 << N) - 1U): New
	simplification.

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94589-2.c: New test.

--- gcc/match.pd.jj	2021-05-12 09:45:55.832976540 +0200
+++ gcc/match.pd	2021-05-13 19:51:17.458507854 +0200
@@ -4792,6 +4792,22 @@ (define_operator_list COND_TERNARY
   (cmp (bit_and:cs @0 @2) (bit_and:cs @1 @2))
   (cmp (bit_and (bit_xor @0 @1) @2) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@2)); })))
 
+#if GIMPLE
+/* (X & (-1 << N)) == 0 becomes X <= (1 << N) - 1.  */
+(for cmp (eq ne)
+     ncmp (le gt)
+ (simplify
+  (cmp:c (bit_and:cs @0 INTEGER_CST@1) integer_zerop)
+  (with { tree utype = NULL_TREE;
+	  int tz = wi::ctz (wi::to_wide (@1));
+	  int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@1));
+	  if (tz && wi::eq_p (wi::shifted_mask (tz, prec - tz, false, prec),
+			      wi::to_wide (@1)))
+	    utype = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); }
+   (if (utype)
+    (ncmp (convert:utype @0) (convert:utype (bit_not @1)))))))
+#endif
+
 /* (X < 0) != (Y < 0) into (X ^ Y) < 0.
    (X >= 0) != (Y >= 0) into (X ^ Y) < 0.
    (X < 0) == (Y < 0) into (X ^ Y) >= 0.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94589-2.c.jj	2021-05-13 19:55:21.201854003 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94589-2.c	2021-05-13 19:54:59.804086977 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/94589 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+int
+foo (int x)
+{
+  return (x & (-1 << 7)) == 0;
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " = \\\(unsigned int\\\) x_" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " & -128" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " <= 127" "optimized" } } */
+}
+
+int
+bar (int y)
+{
+  return (y & (-1 << 12)) != 0;
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " = \\\(unsigned int\\\) y_" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " & -4096" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " > 4095" "optimized" } } */
+}


	Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list