require et random_device for cons token test

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 25/03/21 11:57 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 25/03/21 07:17 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>On Mar 24, 2021, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>This works for me on x86_64-linux and powerpc64le-linux, and also on
>>>x86_64-linux when I kluge the config macros so that the new code path
>>>gets used. Does this work for VxWorks?
>>
>>Thanks.  I (trivially) backported it to apply on our gcc-10 tree, and
>>tested that on x86_64-vx7r2, and I confirm it works there too.
>>
>>However, I suspect there's a series of typos in the patch.  You appear
>>to be using the 'which' enum variable for bit testing, but with '|'
>>rather than '&'.
>
>Oops, that's what I get for a last-minute rewrite without proper
>testing. I originally had:
>
>  if (which == blah || which == any)
>
>and then borked it in an attempt to use & instead.
>
>I'll fix that locally too.

Here's what I've pushed to trunk.

Tested x86_64-linux, powerpc64le-linux, x86_64-w64-mingw.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.txt
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 17560 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20210326/20a4819b/attachment.bin>