[PATCH 0/3] Uncontroversial improvements to C++20 wait-related implementation
Jonathan Wakely
jwakely@redhat.com
Tue Mar 23 16:35:49 GMT 2021
On 23/03/21 09:26 -0700, Thiago Macieira via Libstdc++ wrote:
>On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 08:39:43 PDT Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>> I will be submitting a new patch for the
>> atomic.wait/barrier/latch/semaphore functionality a bit later today that
>> subsumes the changes to atomic_wait and latch, and includes the changes
>> to barrier.
>
>Thanks, Thomas
>
>Is that meant to be part of GCC 11's release?
Yes.
>If not, what do we do about preventing the future BC break and potential
>heisenbugs?
>
> 1) do nothing, accept they will happen silently
This is our current policy for experimental features and it isn't
going to change for GCC 11.
> 2) cause non-silent BC breaks
> 3) disable the code for now (unless explicitly opted-in)
>
>--
>Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering
>
>
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list