[PATCH] [PR99581] Define relaxed memory and use it for aarch64

[Vladimir Makarov]

On 2021-03-19 11:03 a.m., Alex Coplan wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On 19/03/2021 10:21, Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> The following patch solves P1 PR99581
>>
>>      https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
>>
>> The patch was successfully tested and bootstrapped on x86-64, ppc64le,
>> aarch64.
>>
>> Is it ok for the trunk?
> Can we avoid using the term "relaxed memory" here? The overlap with memory
> models (as in relaxed memory concurrency) is rather misleading.
>
I am open to rename if people propose a good alternative.

I had only one good alternative define_permissive_memory but it is longer.