[PATCH] [PR99581] Define relaxed memory and use it for aarch64

[Alex Coplan]

Hi Vladimir,

On 19/03/2021 10:21, Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The following patch solves P1 PR99581
> 
>     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
> 
> The patch was successfully tested and bootstrapped on x86-64, ppc64le,
> aarch64.
> 
> Is it ok for the trunk?

Can we avoid using the term "relaxed memory" here? The overlap with memory
models (as in relaxed memory concurrency) is rather misleading.

I'm not a maintainer, so this is just a suggestion.

Thanks,
Alex