[PATCH] c++: requires-expression folding [PR101182]
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Thu Jun 24 14:42:28 GMT 2021
On 6/23/21 7:37 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Here we're crashing because cp_fold_function walks into the (templated)
> requirements of a requires-expression outside a template, but the
> folding routines aren't prepared to handle templated trees. This patch
> fixes this by making cp_fold use evaluate_requires_expr to fold a
> requires-expression as a whole, which also means we no longer need to
> explicitly do so during gimplification. (We don't immediately fold
> non-dependent requires-expressions at parse time for sake of better
> diagnostics in case one appears as the condition of a failed
> static_assert.)
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, also tested on
> cmcstl2 and range-v3, does this look OK for trunk/11?
OK.
> PR c++/101182
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * constraint.cc (evaluate_requires_expr): Adjust function comment.
> * cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: Move to ...
> (cp_fold) <case REQUIRES_EXPR>: ... here.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires27.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 2 +-
> gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c | 10 ++++------
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires27.C | 10 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires27.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> index 74b16d27101..286332ba2a7 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> @@ -3340,7 +3340,7 @@ evaluate_concept_check (tree check)
> }
>
> /* Evaluate the requires-expression T, returning either boolean_true_node
> - or boolean_false_node. This is used during gimplification and constexpr
> + or boolean_false_node. This is used during folding and constexpr
> evaluation. */
>
> tree
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> index 96d91b6ef2f..33e10556e32 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> @@ -1465,12 +1465,6 @@ cp_genericize_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtrees, void *data)
> TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE (stmt) = 1;
> break;
>
> - case REQUIRES_EXPR:
> - /* Emit the value of the requires-expression. */
> - *stmt_p = evaluate_requires_expr (stmt);
> - *walk_subtrees = 0;
> - break;
> -
> case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR:
> gcc_assert (concept_check_p (stmt));
> /* Emit the value of the concept check. */
> @@ -2708,6 +2702,10 @@ cp_fold (tree x)
> x = r;
> break;
>
> + case REQUIRES_EXPR:
> + x = evaluate_requires_expr (x);
> + break;
> +
> default:
> return org_x;
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires27.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires27.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..87a759a689a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires27.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +// PR c++/101182
> +// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
> +
> +int a;
> +int g(bool);
> +
> +int f() {
> + g(requires { a++; });
> + return requires { a++; };
> +}
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list