[PATCH V3] Split loop for NE condition.

guojiufu guojiufu@linux.ibm.com
Tue Jun 22 03:55:04 GMT 2021


On 2021-06-21 16:51, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021, guojiufu wrote:
> 
>> On 2021-06-09 17:42, guojiufu via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > On 2021-06-08 18:13, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> >>
>> > cut...
>> >>> +      gcond *cond = as_a<gcond *> (last);
>> >>> +      enum tree_code code = gimple_cond_code (cond);
>> >>> +      if (!(code == NE_EXPR
>> >>> +	    || (code == EQ_EXPR && (e->flags & EDGE_TRUE_VALUE))))
>> >>
>> >> The NE_EXPR check misses a corresponding && (e->flags & EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)
>> >> check.
>> >>
>> > Thanks, check (e->flags & EDGE_FALSE_VALUE) would be safer.
>> >
>> >>> +	continue;
>> >>> +
>> >>> +      /* Check if bound is invarant.  */
>> >>> +      tree idx = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
>> >>> +      tree bnd = gimple_cond_rhs (cond);
>> >>> +      if (expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, idx))
>> >>> +	std::swap (idx, bnd);
>> >>> +      else if (!expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, bnd))
>> >>> +	continue;
>> >>> +
>> >>> +      /* Only unsigned type conversion could cause wrap.  */
>> >>> +      tree type = TREE_TYPE (idx);
>> >>> +      if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TREE_CODE (idx) != SSA_NAME
>> >>> +	  || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
>> >>> +	continue;
>> >>> +
>> >>> +      /* Avoid to split if bound is MAX/MIN val.  */
>> >>> +      tree bound_type = TREE_TYPE (bnd);
>> >>> +      if (TREE_CODE (bnd) == INTEGER_CST && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (bound_type)
>> >>> +	  && (tree_int_cst_equal (bnd, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (bound_type))
>> >>> +	      || tree_int_cst_equal (bnd, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (bound_type))))
>> >>> +	continue;
>> >>
>> >> Note you do not require 'bnd' to be constant and thus at runtime those
>> >> cases still need to be handled correctly.
>> > Yes, bnd is not required to be constant.  The above code is filtering the
>> > case
>> > where bnd is const max/min value of the type.  So, the code could be updated
>> > as:
>> >       if (tree_int_cst_equal (bnd, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (bound_type))
>> >           || tree_int_cst_equal (bnd, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (bound_type)))
> 
> Yes, and the comment adjusted to "if bound is known to be MAX/MIN val."
> 
>> >>
>> >>> +      /* Check if there is possible wrap.  */
>> >>> +      class tree_niter_desc niter;
>> >>> +      if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, e, &niter, false, false))
>> > cut...
>> >>> +
>> >>> +  /* Change if (i != n) to LOOP1:if (i > n) and LOOP2:if (i < n) */
>> >>
>> >> It now occurs to me that we nowhere check the evolution of IDX
>> >> (split_at_bb_p uses simple_iv for this for example).  The transform
>> >> assumes that we will actually hit i == n and that i increments, but
>> >> while you check the control IV from number_of_iterations_exit
>> >> for NE_EXPR that does not guarantee a positive evolution.
>> >>
>> > If I do not correctly reply your question, please point out:
>> > number_of_iterations_exit is similar with simple_iv to invoke
>> > simple_iv_with_niters
>> > which check the evolution, and number_of_iterations_exit check
>> > number_of_iterations_cond
>> > which check no_overflow more accurate, this is one reason I use this
>> > function.
>> >
>> > This transform assumes that the last run hits i==n.
>> > Otherwise, the loop may run infinitely wrap after wrap.
>> > For safe, if the step is 1 or -1,  this assumption would be true.  I
>> > would add this check.
> 
> OK.
> 
>> > Thanks so much for pointing out I missed the negative step!
>> >
>> >> Your testcases do not include any negative step examples, but I guess
>> >> the conditions need to be swapped in this case?
>> >
>> > I would add cases and code to support step 1/-1.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I think you also have to consider the order we split, say with
>> >>
>> >>   for (i = start; i != end; ++i)
>> >>     {
>> >>       push (i);
>> >>       if (a[i] != b[i])
>> >>         break;
>> >>     }
>> >>
>> >> push (i) calls need to be in the same order for all cases of
>> >> start < end, start == end and start > end (and also cover
>> >> runtime testcases with end == 0 or end == UINT_MAX, likewise
>> >> for start).
>> > I add tests for the above cases. If missing sth, please point out, thanks!
>> >
>> >>
>> >>> +  bool inv = expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, gimple_cond_lhs (gc));
>> >>> +  enum tree_code up_code = inv ? LT_EXPR : GT_EXPR;
>> >>> +  enum tree_code down_code = inv ? GT_EXPR : LT_EXPR;
>> > cut....
>> >
>> > Thanks again for the very helpful review!
>> >
>> > BR,
>> > Jiufu Guo.
>> 
>> Here is the updated patch, thanks for your time!
>> 
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split1.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..dd2d03a7b96
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsplit-loops -fdump-tree-lsplit-details" } */
>> +
>> +void
>> +foo (int *a, int *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (++l != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +void
>> +foo_1 (int *a, int *b, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  unsigned l = 0;
>> +  while (++l != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void
>> +foo1 (int *a, int *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (l++ != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* No wrap.  */
>> +void
>> +foo1_1 (int *a, int *b, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  unsigned l = 0;
>> +  while (l++ != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +foo2 (char *a, char *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (++l != n)
>> +    if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +foo2_1 (char *a, char *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  l = 0;
>> +  while (++l != n)
>> +    if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +foo3 (char *a, char *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (l++ != n)
>> +    if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* No wrap.  */
>> +unsigned
>> +foo3_1 (char *a, char *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  l = 0;
>> +  while (l++ != n)
>> +    if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void
>> +bar ();
>> +void
>> +foo4 (unsigned n, unsigned i)
>> +{
>> +  do
>> +    {
>> +      if (i == n)
>> +	return;
>> +      bar ();
>> +      ++i;
>> +    }
>> +  while (1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +find_skip_diff (char *p, char *q, unsigned n, unsigned i)
>> +{
>> +  while (p[i] == q[i] && ++i != n)
>> +    p++, q++;
>> +
>> +  return i;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Loop split" 8 "lsplit" } } */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split2.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..56377e2f2f5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split2.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
>> +/* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>> +
>> +extern void
>> +abort (void);
>> +extern void
>> +exit (int);
>> +void
>> +push (int);
>> +
>> +#define NI __attribute__ ((noinline))
>> +
>> +void NI
>> +foo (int *a, int *b, unsigned char l, unsigned char n)
>> +{
>> +  while (++l != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned NI
>> +bar (int *a, int *b, unsigned char l, unsigned char n)
>> +{
>> +  while (l++ != n)
>> +    {
>> +      push (l);
>> +      if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +	break;
>> +      push (l + 1);
>> +    }
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void NI
>> +foo_1 (int *a, int *b, unsigned char l, unsigned char n)
>> +{
>> +  while (--l != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned NI
>> +bar_1 (int *a, int *b, unsigned char l, unsigned char n)
>> +{
>> +  while (l-- != n)
>> +    {
>> +      push (l);
>> +      if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +	break;
>> +      push (l + 1);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int a[258];
>> +int b[258];
>> +int c[1024];
>> +static int top = 0;
>> +void
>> +push (int e)
>> +{
>> +  c[top++] = e;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void
>> +reset ()
>> +{
>> +  top = 0;
>> +  __builtin_memset (c, 0, sizeof (c));
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define check(a, b) (a == b)
>> +
>> +int
>> +check_c (int *c, int a0, int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5)
>> +{
>> +  return check (c[0], a0) && check (c[1], a1) && check (c[2], a2)
>> +	 && check (c[3], a3) && check (c[4], a4) && check (c[5], a5);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int
>> +main ()
>> +{
>> +  __builtin_memcpy (b, a, sizeof (a));
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 6, 8) != 9 || !check_c (c, 7, 8, 8, 9, 0, 0))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 5, 3) != 4 || !check_c (c, 6, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9)
>> +      || !check_c (c + 496, 254, 255, 255, 256, 0, 1))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 6, 6) != 7 || !check_c (c, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 253, 255) != 0 || !check_c (c, 254, 255, 255, 256, 
>> 0, 0))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 253, 0) != 1 || !check_c (c, 254, 255, 255, 256, 0, 
>> 1))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 6, 8) != 7 || !check_c (c, 5, 6, 4, 5, 3, 4))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 5, 3) != 2 || !check_c (c, 4, 5, 3, 4, 0, 0))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 6, 6) != 5)
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 2, 255) != 254 || !check_c (c, 1, 2, 0, 1, 255, 
>> 256))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 2, 0) != 255 || !check_c (c, 1, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0))
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  b[100] += 1;
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 90, 110) != 100)
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar (a, b, 110, 105) != 100)
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 90, 110) != 109)
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  reset ();
>> +  if (bar_1 (a, b, 2, 90) != 100)
>> +    abort ();
>> +
>> +  foo (a, b, 99, 99);
>> +  a[99] = b[99] + 1;
>> +  for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
>> +    if (a[i] != b[i] + 1)
>> +      abort ();
>> +
>> +  foo_1 (a, b, 99, 99);
>> +  a[99] = b[99] + 1;
>> +  for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
>> +    if (a[i] != b[i] + 1)
>> +      abort ();
>> +
>> +  exit (0);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split3.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split3.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..ec93ee8bd12
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/loop-split3.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsplit-loops -fdump-tree-lsplit-details" } */
>> +
>> +void
>> +foo (int *a, int *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (--l != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void
>> +foo1 (int *a, int *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (l-- != n)
>> +    a[l] = b[l] + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +foo2 (char *a, char *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (--l != n)
>> +    if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +foo3 (char *a, char *b, unsigned l, unsigned n)
>> +{
>> +  while (l-- != n)
>> +    if (a[l] != b[l])
>> +      break;
>> +
>> +  return l;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void
>> +bar ();
>> +void
>> +foo4 (unsigned n, unsigned i)
>> +{
>> +  do
>> +    {
>> +      if (i == n)
>> +	return;
>> +      bar ();
>> +      --i;
>> +    }
>> +  while (1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned
>> +find_skip_diff (char *p, char *q, unsigned n, unsigned i)
>> +{
>> +  while (p[i] == q[i] && --i != n)
>> +    p--, q--;
>> +
>> +  return i;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Loop split" 6 "lsplit" } } */
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c
>> index 3a09bbc39e5..e9f23b32186 100644
>> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c
>> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>  #include "cfghooks.h"
>>  #include "gimple-fold.h"
>>  #include "gimplify-me.h"
>> +#include "tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.h"
>> 
>>  /* This file implements two kinds of loop splitting.
>> 
>> @@ -229,11 +230,14 @@ easy_exit_values (class loop *loop)
>>     conditional).  I.e. the second loop can now be entered either
>>     via the original entry or via NEW_E, so the entry values of LOOP2
>>     phi nodes are either the original ones or those at the exit
>> -   of LOOP1.  Insert new phi nodes in LOOP2 pre-header reflecting
>> -   this.  The loops need to fulfill easy_exit_values().  */
>> +   of LOOP1.  Selecting the previous value instead next value as the
>> +   exit value of LOOP1 if USE_PREV is true.  Insert new phi nodes in
>> +   LOOP2 pre-header reflecting this.  The loops need to fulfill
>> +   easy_exit_values().  */
>> 
>>  static void
>> -connect_loop_phis (class loop *loop1, class loop *loop2, edge new_e)
>> +connect_loop_phis (class loop *loop1, class loop *loop2, edge new_e,
>> +		   bool use_prev = false)
>>  {
>>    basic_block rest = loop_preheader_edge (loop2)->src;
>>    gcc_assert (new_e->dest == rest);
>> @@ -279,7 +283,8 @@ connect_loop_phis (class loop *loop1, class loop 
>> *loop2,
>> edge new_e)
>> 
>>        gphi * newphi = create_phi_node (new_init, rest);
>>        add_phi_arg (newphi, init, skip_first, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
>> -      add_phi_arg (newphi, next, new_e, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
>> +      add_phi_arg (newphi, use_prev ? PHI_RESULT (phi_first) : next, 
>> new_e,
>> +		   UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
>>        SET_USE (op, new_init);
>>      }
>>  }
>> @@ -1593,6 +1598,252 @@ split_loop_on_cond (struct loop *loop)
>>    return do_split;
>>  }
>> 
>> +/* Check if the LOOP exit branch is like "if (idx != bound)",
>> +   Return the branch edge which exit loop, if wrap may happen on 
>> "idx".  */
>> +
>> +static edge
>> +get_ne_cond_branch (struct loop *loop, tree *step)
>> +{
>> +  int i;
>> +  edge e;
>> +
>> +  auto_vec<edge> edges = get_loop_exit_edges (loop);
>> +  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (edges, i, e)
>> +    {
>> +      basic_block bb = e->src;
>> +
>> +      /* Check if exit at gcond.  */
>> +      gimple *last = last_stmt (bb);
>> +      if (!last || gimple_code (last) != GIMPLE_COND)
>> +	continue;
>> +      gcond *cond = as_a<gcond *> (last);
> 
>    gcond *cont = safe_dyn_cast <gcond *> (last_stmt (bb));
>    if (!last)
>      continue;
> 
> is shorter.
Thanks.

> 
>> +      enum tree_code code = gimple_cond_code (cond);
>> +      if (!((code == NE_EXPR && (e->flags & EDGE_FALSE_VALUE))
>> +	    || (code == EQ_EXPR && (e->flags & EDGE_TRUE_VALUE))))
>> +	continue;
>> +
>> +      /* Check if bound is invarant.  */
>> +      tree idx = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
>> +      tree bnd = gimple_cond_rhs (cond);
>> +      if (expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, idx))
>> +	std::swap (idx, bnd);
>> +      else if (!expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, bnd))
>> +	continue;
>> +
>> +      /* Only unsigned type conversion could cause wrap.  */
>> +      tree type = TREE_TYPE (idx);
>> +      if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TREE_CODE (idx) != SSA_NAME
>> +	  || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
>> +	continue;
>> +
>> +      /* Avoid to split if bound is MAX/MIN val.  */
>> +      tree bound_type = TREE_TYPE (bnd);
>> +      if (tree_int_cst_equal (bnd, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (bound_type))
>> +	  || tree_int_cst_equal (bnd, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (bound_type)))
>> +	continue;
>> +
>> +      /* Check if there is possible wrap.  */
>> +      class tree_niter_desc niter;
>> +      if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, e, &niter, false, false))
>> +	continue;
>> +      if (niter.control.no_overflow)
>> +	return NULL;
>> +      if (niter.cmp != NE_EXPR)
>> +	continue;
>> +      if (!integer_onep (niter.control.step)
>> +	  && !integer_minus_onep (niter.control.step))
>> +	continue;
>> +      *step = niter.control.step;
>> +
>> +      /* If exit edge is just before the empty latch, it is easy to 
>> link
>> +	 the split loops: just jump from the exit edge of one loop to the
>> +	 header of new loop.  */
>> +      if (single_pred_p (loop->latch)
>> +	  && single_pred_edge (loop->latch)->src == bb
>> +	  && empty_block_p (loop->latch))
>> +	return e;
>> +
>> +      /* If exit edge is at end of header, and header contains i++ or 
>> ++i,
>> +	 only, it is simple to link the split loops: jump from the end of
>> +	 one loop header to the new loop header, and use unchanged PHI 
>> result
>> +	 of the first loop as the entry PHI value of the second loop.  */
>> +      if (bb == loop->header)
>> +	{
>> +	  /* Only one phi.  */
>> +	  gphi_iterator psi = gsi_start_phis (bb);
>> +	  if (gsi_end_p (psi))
>> +	    continue;
>> +	  gphi *phi = psi.phi ();
>> +	  gsi_next (&psi);
>> +	  if (!gsi_end_p (psi))
>> +	    continue;
>> +
>> +	  /* Check it is ++i or ++i */
>> +	  tree next = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_latch_edge (loop));
>> +	  tree prev = PHI_RESULT (phi);
>> +	  if (idx != prev && idx != next)
>> +	    continue;
>> +
>> +	  gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_nondebug_after_labels_bb 
>> (bb);
>> +	  if (gsi_end_p (gsi))
>> +	    continue;
>> +	  gimple *s1 = gsi_stmt (gsi);
>> +	  if (!is_gimple_assign (s1) || gimple_assign_lhs (s1) != next
>> +	      || gimple_assign_rhs1 (s1) != prev)
>> +	    continue;
>> +
>> +	  gsi_next_nondebug (&gsi);
>> +	  if (!gsi_end_p (gsi) && gsi_stmt (gsi) == cond)
>> +	    return e;
>> +	}
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Split the LOOP with NE_EXPR into two loops with GT_EXPR and 
>> LT_EXPR.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +split_ne_loop (struct loop *loop, edge cond_e, tree step)
>> +{
>> +  initialize_original_copy_tables ();
>> +
>> +  struct loop *loop2 = loop_version (loop, boolean_true_node, NULL,
>> +				     profile_probability::always (),
>> +				     profile_probability::never (),
>> +				     profile_probability::always (),
>> +				     profile_probability::always (), true);
>> +
>> +  gcc_assert (loop2);
>> +  update_ssa (TODO_update_ssa);
>> +
>> +  basic_block loop2_cond_exit_bb = get_bb_copy (cond_e->src);
>> +  free_original_copy_tables ();
>> +
>> +  gcond *gc = as_a<gcond *> (last_stmt (cond_e->src));
>> +  gcond *dup_gc = as_a<gcond *> (last_stmt (loop2_cond_exit_bb));
>> +
>> +  /* Invert edges for gcond.  */
>> +  if (gimple_cond_code (gc) == EQ_EXPR)
>> +    {
>> +      auto invert_edge = [](basic_block bb) {
>> +	edge out = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0);
>> +	edge in = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 1);
>> +	if (in->flags & EDGE_TRUE_VALUE)
>> +	  std::swap (in, out);
>> +	in->flags |= EDGE_TRUE_VALUE;
>> +	in->flags &= ~EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
>> +	out->flags |= EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
>> +	out->flags &= ~EDGE_TRUE_VALUE;
>> +      };
>> +
>> +      invert_edge (gimple_bb (gc));
>> +      invert_edge (gimple_bb (dup_gc));
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  /* Change if (i != n) to LOOP1:if (i > n) and LOOP2:if (i < n) */
>> +  bool inv = expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, gimple_cond_lhs (gc));
>> +  if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (step))
>> +    inv = !inv;
>> +  enum tree_code first_loop_code = inv ? LT_EXPR : GT_EXPR;
>> +  enum tree_code second_loop_code = inv ? GT_EXPR : LT_EXPR;
> 
> You could handle gimple_cond_code (gc) == EQ_EXPR via
> 
>    if (gimple_cond_code (gc) == EQ_EXPR)
>     {
>      first_loop_code = invert_tree_comparison (first_loop_code, false);
>      second_loop_code = invert_tree_comparison (second_loop_code, 
> false);
>    }
> 
> that looks simpler than the lambda dance with inverting the edge flags.
I did not use invert_tree_comparison in the code, because it would 
generate
GE_EXPR/LE_EXPR which look like containing EQ_EXPR :)
I would update patch to use invert_tree_comparison which is simpler and 
shorter.

> 
>> +  gimple_cond_set_code (gc, first_loop_code);
>> +  gimple_cond_set_code (dup_gc, second_loop_code);
>> +
>> +  /* Link the exit cond edge to new loop.  */
>> +  gcond *break_cond = as_a<gcond *> (gimple_copy (gc));
>> +  edge pred_e = single_pred_edge (loop->latch);
>> +  bool simple_loop
>> +    = pred_e && pred_e->src == cond_e->src && empty_block_p 
>> (loop->latch);
>> +  if (simple_loop)
>> +    gimple_cond_set_code (break_cond, second_loop_code);
>> +  else
>> +    gimple_cond_make_true (break_cond);
>> +
>> +  basic_block break_bb = split_edge (cond_e);
>> +  gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_last_bb (break_bb);
>> +  gsi_insert_after (&gsi, break_cond, GSI_NEW_STMT);
>> +
>> +  edge to_exit = single_succ_edge (break_bb);
>> +  edge to_new_loop = make_edge (break_bb, loop_preheader_edge 
>> (loop2)->src,
>> 0);
>> +  to_new_loop->flags |= EDGE_TRUE_VALUE;
>> +  to_exit->flags |= EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
>> +  to_exit->flags &= ~EDGE_FALLTHRU;
>> +  to_exit->probability = cond_e->probability;
>> +  to_new_loop->probability = to_exit->probability.invert ();
>> +
>> +  update_ssa (TODO_update_ssa);
> 
> I've re-organized the pass to perform a single TODO_update_ssa at the
> very end, please do not update SSA form here, nor
> 
>> +  connect_loop_phis (loop, loop2, to_new_loop, !simple_loop);
>> +
>> +  rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa_1 (NULL, 0, SSA_OP_USE, loop);
> 
> re-write into loop-closed SSA.
Thanks!
> 
>> +  if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>> +    fprintf (dump_file, ";; Loop split on wrap index.\n");
>> +
>> +  return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Checks if LOOP contains a suitable NE_EXPR conditional block to 
>> split.
>> +L_H:
>> + if (i!=N)
>> +   S;
>> + else
>> +   goto EXIT;
>> + i++;
>> + goto L_H;
>> +
>> +The "i!=N" is like "i>N || i<N", then it could be transformed to:
>> +
>> +L_H:
>> + if (i>N)
>> +   S;
>> + else
>> +   goto EXIT;
>> + i++;
>> + goto L_H;
>> +L1_H:
>> + if (i<N)
>> +   S;
>> + else
>> +   goto EXIT;
>> + i++;
>> + goto L1_H;
>> +
>> +The loop with "i<N" is in favor of both GIMPLE and RTL passes.  */
>> +
>> +static bool
>> +split_loop_on_ne_cond (class loop *loop)
>> +{
>> +  tree step;
>> +  edge branch_edge = get_ne_cond_branch (loop, &step);
>> +  if (!branch_edge)
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  int num = 0;
>> +  basic_block *bbs = get_loop_body (loop);
>> +  for (unsigned i = 0; i < loop->num_nodes; i++)
>> +    num += estimate_num_insns_seq (bb_seq (bbs[i]), 
>> &eni_size_weights);
> 
> Since the motivation is to make data-refs analyzable after the 
> transform
> if there are no datarefs the transform only increases code-size.  In
> particular I would look for calls which will be not analyzable.  Since
> we're looking at each stmt above that could be embedded here.  As said
> earlier once num exceeds param_max_peeled_insns you can stop the above
> loop.  So heuristically I'd do sth like
Right, if no following optimization enabled, it only increases code-size
and increase branches overhead, and may not gain performance.

> 
>     for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (bbs[i]); !gsi_end_p
> (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
>       {
>         gimple  *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
>         if (is_gimple_debug (stmt))
>           continue;
>         if (gimple_has_side_effects (stmt))
>           {
>             free (bbs);
>             return false;
>           }
>         num += estimate_num_insns (stmt, &eni_size_weights);
>         if (num > param_max_peeled_insns)
>           {
>             free (bbs);
>             return false;
>           }
>         if (gimple_vuse (stmt))
>           any_dr = true;
>       }
>     if (!any_dr)
>       {
>         free (bbs);
>         return false;
>       }
> 
> There's also still the issue that the transformed loop will fail
> number of iteration analysis for the loop that iterates until
> the IV wraps.  That's a blocker for the acceptance of this transform.
Understand, I saw you opened PR101145.

Thanks for your comments!

BR,
Jiufu Guo.

> 
> Richard.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list