[GCC-10 backport][PATCH] arm: Fix the mve multilib for the broken cmse support (pr99939).
Srinath Parvathaneni
srinath.parvathaneni@arm.com
Mon Jun 14 10:34:35 GMT 2021
Hi,
The current CMSE support in the multilib build for
"-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto" is broken
as specified in PR99939 and this patch fixes the issue.
Regression tested on arm-none-eabi and found no regressions.
This patch have cleanly applied, ok for the GCC-10 branch?
Regards,
Srinath.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2021-06-11 Srinath Parvathaneni <srinath.parvathaneni@arm.com>
PR target/99939
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c: Add separate scan-assembler
directives check for target is v8.1-m.main+mve or not before
comparing the assembly output.
* gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c: New test.
libgcc/ChangeLog:
2021-06-11 Srinath Parvathaneni <srinath.parvathaneni@arm.com>
PR target/99939
* config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S: Add __ARM_FEATURE_MVE
macro.
* config/arm/t-arm: To link cmse.o and cmse_nonsecure_call.o
on passing -mcmse option.
(cherry picked from commit c5ed0148347beea1bd34795de146adddd2454c36)
############### Attachment also inlined for ease of reply ###############
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c
index e1ff09257b7900982f49117d4cfc16f3bd79d76c..db7d975a90ea4b3333d1810aea03949ec1e8837e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c
@@ -8,4 +8,5 @@ void bar(f func, int a)
func(a);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "call unspec\\\[\\\[r4:SI\\\]\\\]" "final" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "call unspec\\\[\\\[r4:SI\\\]\\\]" "final" { target { ! arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "call unspec\\\[\\\[r\[0-7\]:SI\\\]\\\]" "final" { target { arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08e89bff6378f1f96950fc40f3ab3946bd433773
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* This test is executed only if the execution engine supports CMSE instructions. */
+/* { dg-options "--save-temps -mcmse -Wl,--section-start,.gnu.sgstubs=0x00400000" } */
+
+#include <arm_cmse.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+void __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry))
+secure_fun (int a, int *p)
+{
+ void *b = cmse_check_address_range ((void *)p, a, 1);
+
+ if (b == NULL)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ printf("%d", *((int *)b));
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ int *ptr;
+ int size = 1;
+ ptr = (int *) calloc (1, sizeof(int *));
+ *ptr = 1315852292;
+ secure_fun (size, ptr);
+ free (ptr);
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S b/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
index 5ba28692d6b8a919939404d0f0d97d490df472e9..b1954b8714d6badc7311992847492c8c123799e0 100644
--- a/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
+++ b/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
.syntax unified
#ifdef __ARM_PCS_VFP
-# if __ARM_FP & 0x8
+# if (__ARM_FP & 0x8) || (__ARM_FEATURE_MVE & 1)
.fpu fpv5-d16
# else
.fpu fpv4-sp-d16
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ vmov s24, s25, r5, r5
vmov s26, s27, r5, r5
vmov s28, s29, r5, r5
vmov s30, s31, r5, r5
-#elif __ARM_FP & 0x08
+#elif (__ARM_FP & 0x8) || (__ARM_FEATURE_MVE & 1)
vmov.f64 d9, d8
vmov.f64 d10, d8
vmov.f64 d11, d8
diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm b/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm
index 3625a2590beec4e4e0e0881be9ad284c595c7190..c1553d4e5d80751b13dc2e9c9e36d5ebe82e5f8c 100644
--- a/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm
+++ b/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm
@@ -3,18 +3,17 @@ LIB1ASMFUNCS = _thumb1_case_sqi _thumb1_case_uqi _thumb1_case_shi \
_thumb1_case_uhi _thumb1_case_si _speculation_barrier
HAVE_CMSE:=$(findstring __ARM_FEATURE_CMSE,$(shell $(gcc_compile_bare) -dM -E - </dev/null))
-HAVE_V81M:=$(findstring armv8.1-m.main,$(gcc_compile_bare))
ifeq ($(shell $(gcc_compile_bare) -E -mcmse - </dev/null >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; echo $$?),0)
CMSE_OPTS:=-mcmse
endif
ifdef HAVE_CMSE
-ifndef HAVE_V81M
+
libgcc-objects += cmse.o cmse_nonsecure_call.o
cmse.o: $(srcdir)/config/arm/cmse.c
$(gcc_compile) -c $(CMSE_OPTS) $<
+
cmse_nonsecure_call.o: $(srcdir)/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
$(gcc_compile) -c $<
endif
-endif
-------------- next part --------------
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c
index e1ff09257b7900982f49117d4cfc16f3bd79d76c..db7d975a90ea4b3333d1810aea03949ec1e8837e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-18.c
@@ -8,4 +8,5 @@ void bar(f func, int a)
func(a);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "call unspec\\\[\\\[r4:SI\\\]\\\]" "final" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "call unspec\\\[\\\[r4:SI\\\]\\\]" "final" { target { ! arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "call unspec\\\[\\\[r\[0-7\]:SI\\\]\\\]" "final" { target { arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..08e89bff6378f1f96950fc40f3ab3946bd433773
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-20.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* This test is executed only if the execution engine supports CMSE instructions. */
+/* { dg-options "--save-temps -mcmse -Wl,--section-start,.gnu.sgstubs=0x00400000" } */
+
+#include <arm_cmse.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+void __attribute__((cmse_nonsecure_entry))
+secure_fun (int a, int *p)
+{
+ void *b = cmse_check_address_range ((void *)p, a, 1);
+
+ if (b == NULL)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ printf("%d", *((int *)b));
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ int *ptr;
+ int size = 1;
+ ptr = (int *) calloc (1, sizeof(int *));
+ *ptr = 1315852292;
+ secure_fun (size, ptr);
+ free (ptr);
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S b/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
index 5ba28692d6b8a919939404d0f0d97d490df472e9..b1954b8714d6badc7311992847492c8c123799e0 100644
--- a/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
+++ b/libgcc/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
.syntax unified
#ifdef __ARM_PCS_VFP
-# if __ARM_FP & 0x8
+# if (__ARM_FP & 0x8) || (__ARM_FEATURE_MVE & 1)
.fpu fpv5-d16
# else
.fpu fpv4-sp-d16
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ vmov s24, s25, r5, r5
vmov s26, s27, r5, r5
vmov s28, s29, r5, r5
vmov s30, s31, r5, r5
-#elif __ARM_FP & 0x08
+#elif (__ARM_FP & 0x8) || (__ARM_FEATURE_MVE & 1)
vmov.f64 d9, d8
vmov.f64 d10, d8
vmov.f64 d11, d8
diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm b/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm
index 3625a2590beec4e4e0e0881be9ad284c595c7190..c1553d4e5d80751b13dc2e9c9e36d5ebe82e5f8c 100644
--- a/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm
+++ b/libgcc/config/arm/t-arm
@@ -3,18 +3,17 @@ LIB1ASMFUNCS = _thumb1_case_sqi _thumb1_case_uqi _thumb1_case_shi \
_thumb1_case_uhi _thumb1_case_si _speculation_barrier
HAVE_CMSE:=$(findstring __ARM_FEATURE_CMSE,$(shell $(gcc_compile_bare) -dM -E - </dev/null))
-HAVE_V81M:=$(findstring armv8.1-m.main,$(gcc_compile_bare))
ifeq ($(shell $(gcc_compile_bare) -E -mcmse - </dev/null >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; echo $$?),0)
CMSE_OPTS:=-mcmse
endif
ifdef HAVE_CMSE
-ifndef HAVE_V81M
+
libgcc-objects += cmse.o cmse_nonsecure_call.o
cmse.o: $(srcdir)/config/arm/cmse.c
$(gcc_compile) -c $(CMSE_OPTS) $<
+
cmse_nonsecure_call.o: $(srcdir)/config/arm/cmse_nonsecure_call.S
$(gcc_compile) -c $<
endif
-endif
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list