GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx
Martin Liška
mliska@suse.cz
Fri Jun 11 14:34:39 GMT 2021
On 6/11/21 1:48 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/10/21 7:18 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 6/10/21 11:07 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Doing that, one has 2 unique links, that would be needed for get_option_url function.
>>> Plus, both :option:`-Wfoo` and :option:`-Wno-foo` references are going to work.
>>
>> And I've actually did the transformation and one can see it e.g. here:
>> https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/gcc/_build/html/gcc-command-options/options-to-request-or-suppress-warnings.html#cmdoption-Wprio-ctor-dtor
>
> I find the style you have below right now clearer than keeping both
> options in the same heading and adding a Note explaining the default
> etc. I.e., this
>
> _________________
> -Wchar-subscripts
>
> Warn if an array subscript has type char. This is a common cause
> of error, as programmers often forget that this type is signed on
> some machines. This warning is enabled by -Wall.
>
> ____________________
> -Wno-char-subscripts
>
> Default option value for -Wchar-subscripts.
Yes, fully agree with you!
Thanks,
Martin
>
> on this page right now:
> https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/gcc/_build/html/gcc-command-options/options-to-request-or-suppress-warnings.html#cmdoption-Wchar-subscripts
>
> seems better than this:
>
> _________________________________________________________
> -Wno-shift-overflow, -Wshift-overflow=n, -Wshift-overflow
>
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+
> | (!) Note |
> +---------------------------------------------------------------
> | Default value is -Wno-shift-overflow, -Wshift-overflow is |
> | enabled by -Wall. |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> These options control warnings about left shift overflows.
>
> and also better than the alternative with (non-default) after the option
> in the heading.
>
> https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/demo/_build/html/#cmdoption-Wno-shift-overflow3
>
> Martin
>
>>
>>
>> Martin
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list