[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types

Paul Richard Thomas paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com
Fri Jun 4 15:24:58 GMT 2021

Hi José,

I can second Dominique's thanks. I applied it to my tree when you first
posted, set the regtest in motion and have not been able to return to
gfortran matters since.

OK for master.

I am especially happy that you have tackled this area and have rationalised
it to a substantial degree. The wheel keeps being re-invented by different
people, largely for a lack of documentation or coherent self-documentation.
I know, as one of the guilty ones.



On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 16:05, dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran <
fortran@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi José,
> > Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me.
> Thanks for the work,
> Dominique

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list