[RFC/PATCH] vect: Recog mul_highpart pattern

[Kewen.Lin]

on 2021/7/15 上午3:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> TBH, 79 vs. 80 isn't normally something I'd worry about when reviewing
>> new code.  But I know in the past people have asked for 79 to be used
>> for the “end+1” reason, so I don't think we should “fix” existing code
>> that honours the 79 limit so that it no longer does, especially when the
>> lines surrounding the code aren't changing.
> 
> The normal rule is you cannot go over 80.  It is perfectly fine to have
> shorter lines, certainly if that is nice for some other reason, so
> automatically (by some tool) changing this is Just Wrong.
> 

OK, could this be applied to changelog entry too?  I guess yes?

BR,
Kewen