[committed] fortran: Fix up wording of 3 OpenMP diagnostic messages [PR99303]dbI
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Sun Feb 28 10:18:49 GMT 2021
Hi!
As reported in the PR, some diagnostic messages need wording improvements.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk.
2021-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR fortran/99303
* openmp.c (gfc_omp_requires_add_clause): Fix up diagnostic message
wordings.
(resolve_omp_clauses): Likewise.
--- gcc/fortran/openmp.c.jj 2021-02-18 09:11:25.358114314 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/openmp.c 2021-02-27 19:37:36.976876441 +0100
@@ -3788,11 +3788,11 @@ gfc_omp_requires_add_clause (gfc_omp_req
if (clause & OMP_REQ_ATOMIC_MEM_ORDER_MASK)
gfc_error ("!$OMP REQUIRES clause %<atomic_default_mem_order(%s)%> "
"specified via module %qs use at %L but same clause is "
- "not set at for the program unit", clause_name, module_name,
- loc);
+ "not specified for the program unit", clause_name,
+ module_name, loc);
else
gfc_error ("!$OMP REQUIRES clause %qs specified via module %qs use at "
- "%L but same clause is not set at for the program unit",
+ "%L but same clause is not specified for the program unit",
clause_name, module_name, loc);
return false;
}
@@ -5411,7 +5411,7 @@ resolve_omp_clauses (gfc_code *code, gfc
if (has_inscan && has_notinscan && is_reduction)
{
gfc_error ("%<inscan%> and non-%<inscan%> %<reduction%> "
- "clauses on the same construct %L",
+ "clauses on the same construct at %L",
&n->where);
break;
}
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list