Committed, pr95690.f90: move error line for CRIS.

Hans-Peter Nilsson hp@axis.com
Thu Feb 25 16:35:26 GMT 2021


I don't know what it is that ix86, x86_64, Solaris and
apparently CRIS has in common here.

According to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-February/652763.html
m68k-unknown-linux-gnu is also in that bunch, but since
there's a *-*-solaris* in the target specifier and also m68k
vs. m68k*, I'm leaving the adjustment to a maintainer.

gcc/testsuite:
	* gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90: CRIS error appears on line 5.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90
index da809a0d3b34..7d8c68d1d7c3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 module m
 contains
    subroutine s
-      print *, (erfc) ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris* } }
-   end ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target { ! "i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris*" } } }
+      print *, (erfc) ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris* cris-*-* } }
+   end ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target { ! "i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris* cris-*-*" } } }
    function erfc()
    end
 end
-- 
2.11.0



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list