[PATCH] fold-const: Fix up ((1 << x) & y) != 0 folding for vectors [PR99225]
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Wed Feb 24 10:50:38 GMT 2021
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This optimization was written purely with scalar integers in mind,
> can work fine even with vectors, but we can't use build_int_cst but
> need to use build_one_cst instead.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
Richard.
> 2021-02-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/99225
> * fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) <case NE_EXPR>: In (x & (1 << y)) != 0
> to ((x >> y) & 1) != 0 simplifications use build_one_cst instead of
> build_int_cst (..., 1). Formatting fixes.
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/fold-const.c.jj 2021-02-23 09:49:40.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/fold-const.c 2021-02-23 19:53:33.143763292 +0100
> @@ -12044,23 +12044,23 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc, enum tr
> && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg00, 0)))
> {
> tree tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, RSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg00),
> - arg01, TREE_OPERAND (arg00, 1));
> + arg01, TREE_OPERAND (arg00, 1));
> tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, BIT_AND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg0), tem,
> - build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (arg0), 1));
> + build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (arg0)));
> return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type,
> - fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (arg1), tem),
> - arg1);
> + fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
> + tem), arg1);
> }
> else if (TREE_CODE (arg01) == LSHIFT_EXPR
> && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (arg01, 0)))
> {
> tree tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, RSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg01),
> - arg00, TREE_OPERAND (arg01, 1));
> + arg00, TREE_OPERAND (arg01, 1));
> tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, BIT_AND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg0), tem,
> - build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (arg0), 1));
> + build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (arg0)));
> return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type,
> - fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (arg1), tem),
> - arg1);
> + fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
> + tem), arg1);
> }
> }
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c.jj 2021-02-23 20:12:01.825464969 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c 2021-02-23 20:11:45.962640464 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/99225 */
> +
> +typedef int V __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (int))));
> +
> +void
> +foo (V *x)
> +{
> + x[2] = (x[0] & (1 << x[1])) != 0;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar (V *x)
> +{
> + x[2] = ((1 << x[1]) & x[0]) != 0;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +baz (V *x)
> +{
> + V a = 1 << x[1];
> + V b = a & x[0];
> + x[2] = b != 0;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +qux (V *x)
> +{
> + V a = 1 << x[1];
> + V b = x[0] & a;
> + x[2] = b != 0;
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list