[patch, libfortran] PR95647 operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

[Jerry DeLisle]

How do I get permissions set so that I can change status of bug reports 
and assign to myself.  My permissions got dissolved during some 
evolution in the last year.

also

The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle<jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0631e008adc759cc801d0d034224ee6b4bcf31aa

commit r11-7225-g0631e008adc759cc801d0d034224ee6b4bcf31aa
Author: Steve Kargl<sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date:   Fri Feb 12 07:58:16 2021 -0800



On 2/11/21 7:02 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> The attached patch is another provided from Steve Kargle in the PR 
> report.
>
> I have created a test case and regression tested the result.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry
>
> libgfortran: Fix PR95647 by changing the interfaces of operators .eq. 
> and .ne.
>
> The FE converts the old school .eq. to ==,
> and then tracks the ==.  The module starts with == and so it does not
> properly overload the .eq.  Reversing the interfaces fixes this.
>
> 2021-02-11  Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
>
> libgfortran/ChangeLog:
>
>     PR libfortran 95647
>     * ieee/ieee_arithmetic.F90: Flip interfaces of operators .eq. to
>     == and .ne. to /= .
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>     PR libfortran 95647
>     * gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_arithmetic: New test.
>