[Patch 2/8, Arm, GCC] Add Armv8.1-M Mainline target feature +pacbti. [Was RE: [Patch 1/7, Arm, GCC] Add Armv8.1-M Mainline target feature +pacbti.]

Richard Earnshaw Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com
Fri Dec 3 14:59:52 GMT 2021



On 28/10/2021 12:41, Tejas Belagod via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 1:29 PM
>> To: Tejas Belagod <Tejas.Belagod@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [Patch 1/7, Arm, GCC] Add Armv8.1-M Mainline target feature
>> +pacbti.
>>
>> On 08/10/2021 13:17, Tejas Belagod via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds the -march feature +pacbti to Armv8.1-M Mainline.
>>> This feature enables pointer signing and authentication instructions
>>> on M-class architectures.
>>>
>>> Tested on arm-none-eabi. OK for trunk?
>>>
>>> 2021-10-04  Tejas Belagod  <tbelagod@arm.com>
>>>
>>> gcc/Changelog:
>>>
>>> 	* config/arm/arm-cpus.in: Define new feature pacbti.
>>> 	* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_PACBTI): New.
>>>
>>
>> "+pacbti" needs to be documented in invoke.texi at the appropriate place.
>>
> 
> Thanks for the reviews.
> 
> This patch adds the -march feature +pacbti to Armv8.1-M Mainline.
> This feature enables pointer signing and authentication instructions
> on M-class architectures.
> 
> 2021-10-25  Tejas Belagod  <tbelagod@arm.com>
> 
> gcc/Changelog:
> 
> 	* config/arm/arm-cpus.in: Define new feature pacbti.
> 	* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_PACBTI): New.
> 	* doc/invoke.texi: Document new feature pacbti.

This isn't in the correct style:

gcc/Changelog:

	* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_PACBTI): New macro.
	* config/arm/arm-cpus.in (pacbti): New feature.
	* doc/invoke.texi (Arm Options): Document it.

would be better.

> 
> 
> Tested the following configurations, OK for trunk?
> 
> -mthumb/-march=armv8.1-m.main+pacbti/-mfloat-abi=soft
> -marm/-march=armv7-a/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16/-mfloat-abi=softfp
> mcmodel=small and tiny
> aarch64-none-linux-gnu native test and bootstrap
> 
> 
>> R.

Otherwise OK.

R.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list