[PATCH] Use _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS as _GLIBCXX_DEBUG light

François Dumont frs.dumont@gmail.com
Fri Aug 6 14:52:46 GMT 2021


On 07/06/21 6:25 am, François Dumont wrote:
> On 03/06/21 2:31 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>> +  }
>>> +
>>>   /* Checks that [first, last) is a valid range, and then returns
>>>    * __first. This routine is useful when we can't use a separate
>>>    * assertion statement because, e.g., we are in a constructor.
>>> @@ -260,8 +279,9 @@ namespace __gnu_debug
>>>     inline bool
>>>     __check_sorted(const _InputIterator& __first, const 
>>> _InputIterator& __last)
>>>     {
>>> -      return __check_sorted_aux(__first, __last,
>>> -                std::__iterator_category(__first));
>>> +      return __skip_debug_runtime_check()
>>> +    || __check_sorted_aux(__first, __last,
>>> +                  std::__iterator_category(__first));
>>
>> Currently this function is never called at all ifndef _GLIBCXX_DEBUG.
>> With this change, it's going to be present for _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS,
>> and if it isn't inlined it's going to explode the code size.
>>
>> Some linux distros are already building the entire distro with
>> _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS so I think we need to be quite careful about this
>> kind of large change affecting every algo.
>>
>> So maybe we shouldn't enable these checks via _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS, but
>> a new macro.
>>
> _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is already rarely used, so will be yet another mode.
>
> So let's forget about all this, thanks.
>
I eventually wonder if your feedback was limited to the use of 
__check_sorted and some other codes perhaps.

So here is another proposal which activate a small subset of the 
_GLIBCXX_DEBUG checks in _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS but with far less code.

First, the _Error_formatter is not used, the injected checks are simply 
using __glibcxx_assert.

Second I reduced the number of accitaved checks, mostly the __valid_range.

I also enhance the valid_range check for constexpr because sometimes the 
normal implementation is good enough to let the compiler diagnose a 
potential issue in this context. This is for example the case of the 
std::equal implementation whereas the std::copy implementation is too 
defensive.

     libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS] Activate basic debug checks

     libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

             * include/bits/stl_algobase.h (equal): Use runtime-only 
_GLIBCXX_DEBUG check.
             * include/bits/stl_iterator.h [_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS]: 
Include <debug/stl_iterator.h>.
             * include/debug/debug.h [_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS]: Define debug 
macros non-empty. Most of
             the time do a simple valid_range check.
             * include/debug/helper_functions.h: Cleanup comment about 
removed _Iter_base.
             (__valid_range): Add __skip_if_constexpr parameter and skip 
check when in a constexpr
             context.
             * include/debug/macros.h (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_VERIFY): Define as 
__glibcxx_assert when only
             _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS is defined.
             (__glibcxx_check_valid_range): Add _SkipIfConstexpr parameter.
             (__glibcxx_check_can_increment_range): Likewise.
             * testsuite/24_iterators/istream_iterator/1.cc (test01): 
Skip iterator increment when
             _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS is defined.
             * testsuite/25_algorithms/copy/constexpr_neg.cc: New test.
             * testsuite/25_algorithms/heap/1.cc: Skip operation 
complexity checks when _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
             is defined.
             * 
testsuite/25_algorithms/lower_bound/debug/constexpr_partitioned_neg.cc: 
Fix dg-prune-output reason.
             * 
testsuite/25_algorithms/lower_bound/debug/constexpr_partitioned_pred_neg.cc: 
Likewise.
             * 
testsuite/25_algorithms/lower_bound/debug/constexpr_valid_range_neg.cc: 
Likewise.
             * 
testsuite/25_algorithms/upper_bound/debug/constexpr_partitioned_neg.cc: 
Likewise.
             * 
testsuite/25_algorithms/upper_bound/debug/constexpr_partitioned_pred_neg.cc: 
Likewise.
             * 
testsuite/25_algorithms/upper_bound/debug/constexpr_valid_range_neg.cc: 
Likewise.

The last fixes below are due to the recent changes to the 
__glibcxx_assert macro but it is close to the code I am changing so I 
prefer to fix those here.

Tested under Linux x86_64 w/o _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS.

Ok to commit ?

François

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: assertion_mode.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 22902 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20210806/640bdd3e/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list