[committed][testsuite, nvptx] Fix gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c
Tom de Vries
tdevries@suse.de
Thu Sep 24 12:32:06 GMT 2020
Hi,
With nvptx, we run into:
...
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c scan-assembler-not \
emutls_get_address.*emutls_get_address.*
...
because the nvptx assembly looks like:
...
call (%value_in), __emutls_get_address, (%out_arg1);
...
// BEGIN GLOBAL FUNCTION DECL: __emutls_get_address
.extern .func (.param.u64 %value_out) __emutls_get_address (.param.u64 %in_ar0);
...
Fix this by checking the slim final dump instead, where we have just:
...
12: r35:DI=call [`__emutls_get_address'] argc:0
...
Committed to trunk.
Thanks,
- Tom
[testsuite, nvptx] Fix gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-09-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c: Scan final dump instead of assembly for
nvptx.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c
index 84eedfdb226..7145671eb95 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/thr-cse-1.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
registers and thus getting the counts wrong. */
/* { dg-additional-options "-mshort-calls" { target epiphany-*-* } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target tls_emulated } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fdump-rtl-final-slim" { target nvptx-*-* } }*/
/* Test that we only get one call to emutls_get_address when CSE is
active. Note that the var _must_ be initialized for the scan asm
@@ -18,10 +19,12 @@ int foo (int b, int c, int d)
return a;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "emutls_get_address.*emutls_get_address.*" { target { ! { "*-wrs-vxworks" "*-*-darwin8" "hppa*-*-hpux*" "i?86-*-mingw*" "x86_64-*-mingw*" visium-*-* } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "emutls_get_address.*emutls_get_address.*" { target { ! { "*-wrs-vxworks" "*-*-darwin8" "hppa*-*-hpux*" "i?86-*-mingw*" "x86_64-*-mingw*" visium-*-* nvptx-*-* } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call\tL___emutls_get_address.stub.*call\tL___emutls_get_address.stub.*" { target "*-*-darwin8" } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "(b,l|bl) __emutls_get_address.*(b,l|bl) __emutls_get_address.*" { target "hppa*-*-hpux*" } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "tls_lookup.*tls_lookup.*" { target *-wrs-vxworks } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call\t___emutls_get_address.*call\t___emutls_get_address" { target "i?86-*-mingw*" } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "call\t__emutls_get_address.*call\t__emutls_get_address" { target "x86_64-*-mingw*" } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "%l __emutls_get_address.*%l __emutls_get_address" { target visium-*-* } } } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "emutls_get_address" 1 "final" { target nvptx-*-* } } } */
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list