[PATCH] g++, libstdc++: implement __is_nothrow_{constructible, assignable}

[Marek Polacek]

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 03:11:29AM +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 03:07, Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Ha, we have the same thing in is_trivially_xible, so I'll drive-by
> > > change that one as well.
> >
> > Please.  Thanks!
> 
> The tree is also on a separated line in is_trivially_xible and
> is_nothrow_xible, but not
> in is_xible. What do we think about line-whitespace changes mixed with
> 'real' changes?

I like to do such cleanups when they are nearby the code I'm changing.  In this
case, I think it's totally fine (though I know not everybody feels the same
way).  Clearly you wouldn't do cleanups in different source files or 1000 lines
away from where you're making your change.

Marek