[PATCH v2] PR target/96759 - Handle global variable assignment from misaligned structure/PARALLEL return values.

Kito Cheng kito.cheng@sifive.com
Mon Oct 5 09:24:21 GMT 2020


ping.


On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:33 PM Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020, Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> > In g:70cdb21e579191fe9f0f1d45e328908e59c0179e, DECL/global variable has
> handled
> > misaligned stores, but it didn't handle PARALLEL values, and I refer the
> > other part of this function, I found the PARALLEL need handled by
> > emit_group_* functions, so I add a check, and using emit_group_store if
> > storing a PARALLEL value, also checked this change didn't break the
> > testcase(gcc.target/arm/unaligned-argument-3.c) added by the orginal
> changes.
> >
> > For riscv64 target, struct S {int a; double b;} will pack into a parallel
> > value to return and it has TImode when misaligned access is supported,
> > however TImode required 16-byte align, but it only 8-byte align, so it
> go to
> > the misaligned stores handling, then it will try to generate move
> > instruction from a PARALLEL value.
> >
> > Tested on following target without introduced new reguression:
> >   - riscv32/riscv64 elf
> >   - x86_64-linux
> >   - arm-eabi
>
> OK if Eric says so.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
> > v2 changes:
> >   - Use maybe_emit_group_store instead of emit_group_store.
> >   - Remove push_temp_slots/pop_temp_slots, emit_group_store only require
> >     stack temp slot when dst is CONCAT or PARALLEL, however
> >     maybe_emit_group_store will always use REG for dst if needed.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >       PR target/96759
> >       * expr.c (expand_assignment): Handle misaligned stores with
> PARALLEL
> >       value.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >       PR target/96759
> >       * g++.target/riscv/pr96759.C: New.
> >       * gcc.target/riscv/pr96759.c: New.
> > ---
> >  gcc/expr.c                               |  2 ++
> >  gcc/testsuite/g++.target/riscv/pr96759.C |  8 ++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr96759.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/riscv/pr96759.C
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr96759.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
> > index 1a15f24b3979..6eb13a12c8c5 100644
> > --- a/gcc/expr.c
> > +++ b/gcc/expr.c
> > @@ -5168,6 +5168,8 @@ expand_assignment (tree to, tree from, bool
> nontemporal)
> >        rtx reg, mem;
> >
> >        reg = expand_expr (from, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_NORMAL);
> > +      /* Handle PARALLEL.  */
> > +      reg = maybe_emit_group_store (reg, TREE_TYPE (from));
> >        reg = force_not_mem (reg);
> >        mem = expand_expr (to, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
> >        if (TREE_CODE (to) == MEM_REF && REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER (to))
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/riscv/pr96759.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/riscv/pr96759.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..673999a4baf7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/riscv/pr96759.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > +/* { dg-options "-mno-strict-align -std=gnu++17" } */
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +struct S {
> > +  int a;
> > +  double b;
> > +};
> > +S GetNumbers();
> > +auto [globalC, globalD] = GetNumbers();
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr96759.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr96759.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..621c39196fca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr96759.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > +/* { dg-options "-mno-strict-align" } */
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +
> > +struct S {
> > +  int a;
> > +  double b;
> > +};
> > +struct S GetNumbers();
> > +struct S g;
> > +
> > +void foo(){
> > +  g = GetNumbers();
> > +}
> >
>
> --
> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
> Germany; GF: Felix Imend
>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list