[PATCH 1/2] make vect_finish_stmt_generation work w/o stmt_vec_info
Richard Sandiford
richard.sandiford@arm.com
Wed May 27 15:40:30 GMT 2020
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> writes:
> This makes the call chain below vec_init_vector happy with a NULL
> stmt_vec_info which is used as "context".
>
> 2020-05-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_finish_stmt_generation_1):
> Conditionalize stmt_info use, assert the new stmt cannot throw
> when not specified.
> (vect_finish_stmt_generation): Adjust assert.
Wasn't sure from this patch in isolation: when's it valid to pass a null
stmt_info? Felt weird that we suddenly needed this now, when we already
have so many callers that follow the existing interface.
Or is this because you want to remove the stmt_info argument entirely
at some point, and this is a step towards that?
Thanks,
Richard
> ---
> gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> index 35043ecd0f9..901999be058 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> @@ -1668,14 +1668,19 @@ vect_finish_stmt_generation_1 (vec_info *vinfo,
> if (dump_enabled_p ())
> dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "add new stmt: %G", vec_stmt);
>
> - gimple_set_location (vec_stmt, gimple_location (stmt_info->stmt));
> + if (stmt_info)
> + {
> + gimple_set_location (vec_stmt, gimple_location (stmt_info->stmt));
>
> - /* While EH edges will generally prevent vectorization, stmt might
> - e.g. be in a must-not-throw region. Ensure newly created stmts
> - that could throw are part of the same region. */
> - int lp_nr = lookup_stmt_eh_lp (stmt_info->stmt);
> - if (lp_nr != 0 && stmt_could_throw_p (cfun, vec_stmt))
> - add_stmt_to_eh_lp (vec_stmt, lp_nr);
> + /* While EH edges will generally prevent vectorization, stmt might
> + e.g. be in a must-not-throw region. Ensure newly created stmts
> + that could throw are part of the same region. */
> + int lp_nr = lookup_stmt_eh_lp (stmt_info->stmt);
> + if (lp_nr != 0 && stmt_could_throw_p (cfun, vec_stmt))
> + add_stmt_to_eh_lp (vec_stmt, lp_nr);
> + }
> + else
> + gcc_assert (!stmt_could_throw_p (cfun, vec_stmt));
>
> return vec_stmt_info;
> }
> @@ -1705,7 +1710,7 @@ vect_finish_stmt_generation (vec_info *vinfo,
> stmt_vec_info stmt_info, gimple *vec_stmt,
> gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
> {
> - gcc_assert (gimple_code (stmt_info->stmt) != GIMPLE_LABEL);
> + gcc_assert (!stmt_info || gimple_code (stmt_info->stmt) != GIMPLE_LABEL);
>
> if (!gsi_end_p (*gsi)
> && gimple_has_mem_ops (vec_stmt))
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list