[PATCH] tree-optimization/95248 - fix oversight in SM rewrite
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Fri May 22 09:45:52 GMT 2020
This fixes a leftover early out in determining the sequence of stores
to materialize.
Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2020-05-22 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/95248
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (sm_seq_valid_bb): Remove bogus early out.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr95248.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr95248.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr95248.c
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr95248.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr95248.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f0efcc12b51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr95248.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target int32plus } */
+
+int var_2 = -2013646301;
+int var_3 = -1126567434;
+unsigned int var_12 = 1;
+unsigned int var_19;
+unsigned int arr_25 [24] [21] [15] [17] [15] ;
+
+void __attribute__((noipa)) test()
+{
+ for (int a = 0; a < 3; a = 42)
+ for (int b = 0; b < 20; b++)
+ for (int c = 0; c < 4; c = 4)
+ for (int d = 0; d < 6; d += 4)
+ for (int e = 0; e < 4; e += 2) {
+ arr_25[a][b][c][d][e] = var_2 || var_3;
+ var_19 = var_12;
+ }
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+ test();
+ if (var_19 != 1)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c
index 63f4ef8883c..fcca099355a 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c
@@ -2436,8 +2436,6 @@ sm_seq_valid_bb (class loop *loop, basic_block bb, tree vdef,
/* Use the sequence from the first edge and push SMs down. */
for (unsigned i = 0; i < first_edge_seq.length (); ++i)
{
- if (first_edge_seq[i].second == sm_other)
- break;
unsigned id = first_edge_seq[i].first;
seq.safe_push (first_edge_seq[i]);
unsigned new_idx;
--
2.25.1
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list