collect2.exe errors not pruned

[Joseph Myers]

On Tue, 19 May 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> > I don't think the error should mention .exe, but I also don't think the 
> > error should mention collect2 (see what I said in 
> > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01772.html>, the existence 
> > of collect2 is an implementation detail).
> 
> I'm not changing collect2, at least not in this patch, but I wouldn't
> mind making the match for the internal executable name optional.  WDYT?
> Untested patch follows.

Allowing a missing executable name is reasonable enough, but I was 
actually thinking that the messages should print "gcc" or whatever command 
the user ran in place of "collect2".

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com