[PATCH v2] generate EH info for volatile asm statements (PR93981)

[Segher Boessenkool]

Hi!

On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 05:18:21PM +0100, J.W. Jagersma wrote:
> The only question I have left now is if my proposed change to the
> documentation is acceptable or should be expanded/reworded.

I think it is fine.  It's easier to judge if you look fresh at it, in
my experience, so I might think differently at stage1 time ;-)

> There is also still the question of whether non-volatile asms should be
> allowed to throw or not.  I don't know if that should be discussed here
> or on the PR.

I think you should just allow it.  But almost always an asm that can
throw *should* be volatile, or else the compiler might optimise it away
in unexpected cases, etc.


Segher