RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:44:47PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> We will still have a surfeit of bugs that we've given short shrift to, but
> let's at least automate what we can.  The initial addition of the relevant
> old(-ish) tests won't of course happen automagically, but it's a price I'm
> willing to pay.  My goal here isn't merely to reduce the number of open PRs;
> it is to improve the testing of the compiler overall.
> 
> Thoughts?

Looks useful to me, but I'd think it might be desirable to use separate
directories for those tests, so that it is more obvious that it is a
different category of tests.  Now that we use git, just using git mv
to move them to another place once they are fixed for good (together with
some dg-* directive tweaks) wouldn't be that much work later.

So having gcc.dg/unfixed/ , g++.dg/unfixed/ , c-c++-common/unfixed/
and their torture/ suffixed variants (or better directory name for those)?

	Jakub