[PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions
Michael Matz
matz@suse.de
Mon Feb 3 17:49:00 GMT 2020
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> The idea is that the [...] part is NOT part of the commit, only part of
> the email.
I understand that, but the subject line of this thread says "e-mail
subject lines", so I thought we were talking about, well, exactly that;
and I see no value of these tags in e-mails either.
(They might have a low but non-zero value for projects that use
a single mailing list for patches and generic discussion, but we are not
such project)
Basically: if they are deemed to clutter the git log for whatever reason,
then there must be a very good argument for why they not also clutter
e-mail subject lines, but instead are essential to have there,
but not in the log.
> 'git am' would strip leading [...] automatically unless
> you've configured, or asked git to do otherwise. So that leading part
> is not counted for the length calculation.
There's still e-mail netiquette which also should be obeyed, or at least
not contradicted by git netiquette.
Ciao,
Michael.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list