[PATCH] ia32: Fix alignment of _Atomic fields [PR65146]
Uros Bizjak
ubizjak@gmail.com
Thu Aug 27 12:20:04 GMT 2020
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:35 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> For _Atomic fields, lowering the alignment of long long or double etc.
> fields on ia32 is undesirable, because then one really can't perform atomic
> operations on those using cmpxchg8b.
>
> The following patch stops lowering the alignment in fields for _Atomic
> types (the x86_field_alignment change) and for -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
> also ensures we don't misalign _Atomic long long etc. automatic variables
> (the ix86_{local,minimum}_alignment changes).
> Not sure about iamcu_alignment change, I know next to nothing about IA MCU,
> but unless it doesn't have cmpxchg8b instruction, it would surprise me if we
> don't want to do it as well.
> clang apparently doesn't lower the field alignment for _Atomic.
Intel MCU implements pentium ISA, which includes cmpxchg8b.
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2020-08-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR target/65146
> * config/i386/i386.c (iamcu_alignment): Don't decrease alignment
> for TYPE_ATOMIC types.
> (ix86_local_alignment): Likewise.
> (ix86_minimum_alignment): Likewise.
> (x86_field_alignment): Likewise, and emit a -Wpsabi diagnostic
> for it.
>
> * gcc.target/i386/pr65146.c: New test.
LGTM, but please allow some time for HJ to comment.
Thanks,
Uros.
> --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2020-08-24 10:00:01.321258451 +0200
> +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2020-08-26 19:19:11.834297395 +0200
> @@ -16487,7 +16487,11 @@ iamcu_alignment (tree type, int align)
>
> /* Intel MCU psABI specifies scalar types > 4 bytes aligned to 4
> bytes. */
> - mode = TYPE_MODE (strip_array_types (type));
> + type = strip_array_types (type);
> + if (TYPE_ATOMIC (type))
> + return align;
> +
> + mode = TYPE_MODE (type);
> switch (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode))
> {
> case MODE_INT:
> @@ -16644,7 +16648,8 @@ ix86_local_alignment (tree exp, machine_
> && align == 64
> && ix86_preferred_stack_boundary < 64
> && (mode == DImode || (type && TYPE_MODE (type) == DImode))
> - && (!type || !TYPE_USER_ALIGN (type))
> + && (!type || (!TYPE_USER_ALIGN (type)
> + && !TYPE_ATOMIC (strip_array_types (type))))
> && (!decl || !DECL_USER_ALIGN (decl)))
> align = 32;
>
> @@ -16757,7 +16762,8 @@ ix86_minimum_alignment (tree exp, machin
> /* Don't do dynamic stack realignment for long long objects with
> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2. */
> if ((mode == DImode || (type && TYPE_MODE (type) == DImode))
> - && (!type || !TYPE_USER_ALIGN (type))
> + && (!type || (!TYPE_USER_ALIGN (type)
> + && !TYPE_ATOMIC (strip_array_types (type))))
> && (!decl || !DECL_USER_ALIGN (decl)))
> {
> gcc_checking_assert (!TARGET_STV);
> @@ -20293,11 +20299,30 @@ x86_field_alignment (tree type, int comp
> return computed;
> if (TARGET_IAMCU)
> return iamcu_alignment (type, computed);
> - mode = TYPE_MODE (strip_array_types (type));
> + type = strip_array_types (type);
> + mode = TYPE_MODE (type);
> if (mode == DFmode || mode == DCmode
> || GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_INT
> || GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_COMPLEX_INT)
> - return MIN (32, computed);
> + {
> + if (TYPE_ATOMIC (type) && computed > 32)
> + {
> + static bool warned;
> +
> + if (!warned && warn_psabi)
> + {
> + const char *url
> + = CHANGES_ROOT_URL "gcc-11/changes.html#ia32_atomic";
> +
> + warned = true;
> + inform (input_location, "the alignment of %<_Atomic %T%> "
> + "fields changed in %{GCC 11.1%}",
> + TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type), url);
> + }
> + }
> + else
> + return MIN (32, computed);
> + }
> return computed;
> }
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65146.c.jj 2020-08-26 19:25:27.720023020 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65146.c 2020-08-26 19:28:24.982535651 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* PR target/65146 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-Wno-psabi" } */
> +
> +struct A { char a; _Atomic long long b; };
> +struct B { char a; _Atomic double b; };
> +struct C { char a; _Atomic long long b[2]; };
> +struct D { char a; _Atomic double b[2]; };
> +extern int a[__builtin_offsetof (struct A, b) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
> +extern int b[__builtin_offsetof (struct B, b) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
> +extern int c[__builtin_offsetof (struct C, b) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
> +extern int d[__builtin_offsetof (struct D, b) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
>
> Jakub
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list