[PATCH 2/5] Make sure that static data member constexpr isn't optimized away in test.
Mon Aug 24 20:59:00 GMT 2020
>> This looks incorrect to me, that is a workaround for a real GCC bug.
Mark> I was discussing this after the BoF with Tom Tromey (CCed) and he also
Mark> thought gdb could/should actually support the DWARF5 representation,
Mark> but because the DW_TAG_variable was removed because the static data
Mark> member wasn't referenced in the gdb testcases.
I updated the gdb bug with some findings:
Mark> This looks really good, and it makes all the FAILs in the gdb bug
Mark> report PASS (when build with -gdwarf-5 as default).
I thought this might be the case; thank you for trying it out.
More information about the Gcc-patches