[PATCH] arm: Fix -mpure-code support/-mslow-flash-data for armv8-m.base [PR94538]
Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.gcc@googlemail.com
Fri Aug 21 22:44:42 GMT 2020
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:32 AM Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> armv8-m.base (cortex-m23) has the movt instruction, so we need to
> disable the define_split to generate a constant in this case,
> otherwise we get incorrect insn constraints as described in PR94538.
>
> We also need to fix the pure-code alternative for thumb1_movsi_insn
> because the assembler complains with instructions like
> movs r0, #:upper8_15:1234
> (Internal error in md_apply_fix)
> We now generate movs r0, 4 instead.
>
> 2020-08-19 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/arm/thumb1.md: Disable set-constant splitter when
> TARGET_HAVE_MOVT.
> (thumb1_movsi_insn): Fix -mpure-code
> alternative.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-2.c: New test.
I take it that this fixes the ICE rather than addressing the code
generation / performance bits that Wilco was referring to ? Really the
other code quality / performance issues listed in the PR should really
be broken down into separate PRs while we take this as a fix for
fixing the ICE,
Under that assumption OK.
Ramana
> ---
> gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-1.c | 13 +++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-2.c | 12 ++++
> 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-1.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-2.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md b/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> index 0ff8190..f0129db 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ (define_split
> "TARGET_THUMB1
> && arm_disable_literal_pool
> && GET_CODE (operands[1]) == CONST_INT
> + && !TARGET_HAVE_MOVT
> && !satisfies_constraint_I (operands[1])"
> [(clobber (const_int 0))]
> "
> @@ -696,18 +697,59 @@ (define_insn "*thumb1_movsi_insn"
> "TARGET_THUMB1
> && ( register_operand (operands[0], SImode)
> || register_operand (operands[1], SImode))"
> - "@
> - movs %0, %1
> - movs %0, %1
> - movw %0, %1
> - #
> - #
> - ldmia\\t%1, {%0}
> - stmia\\t%0, {%1}
> - movs\\t%0, #:upper8_15:%1; lsls\\t%0, #8; adds\\t%0, #:upper0_7:%1; lsls\\t%0, #8; adds\\t%0, #:lower8_15:%1; lsls\\t%0, #8; adds\\t%0, #:lower0_7:%1
> - ldr\\t%0, %1
> - str\\t%1, %0
> - mov\\t%0, %1"
> +{
> + switch (which_alternative)
> + {
> + default:
> + case 0: return "movs\t%0, %1";
> + case 1: return "movs\t%0, %1";
> + case 2: return "movw\t%0, %1";
> + case 3: return "#";
> + case 4: return "#";
> + case 5: return "ldmia\t%1, {%0}";
> + case 6: return "stmia\t%0, {%1}";
> + case 7:
> + /* pure-code alternative: build the constant byte by byte,
> + instead of loading it from a constant pool. */
> + {
> + int i;
> + HOST_WIDE_INT op1 = INTVAL (operands[1]);
> + bool mov_done_p = false;
> + rtx ops[2];
> + ops[0] = operands[0];
> +
> + /* Emit upper 3 bytes if needed. */
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> + {
> + int byte = (op1 >> (8 * (3 - i))) & 0xff;
> +
> + if (byte)
> + {
> + ops[1] = GEN_INT (byte);
> + if (mov_done_p)
> + output_asm_insn ("adds\t%0, %1", ops);
> + else
> + output_asm_insn ("movs\t%0, %1", ops);
> + mov_done_p = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (mov_done_p)
> + output_asm_insn ("lsls\t%0, #8", ops);
> + }
> +
> + /* Emit lower byte if needed. */
> + ops[1] = GEN_INT (op1 & 0xff);
> + if (!mov_done_p)
> + output_asm_insn ("movs\t%0, %1", ops);
> + else if (op1 & 0xff)
> + output_asm_insn ("adds\t%0, %1", ops);
> + return "";
> + }
> + case 8: return "ldr\t%0, %1";
> + case 9: return "str\t%1, %0";
> + case 10: return "mov\t%0, %1";
> + }
> +}
> [(set_attr "length" "2,2,4,4,4,2,2,14,2,2,2")
> (set_attr "type" "mov_reg,mov_imm,mov_imm,multiple,multiple,load_4,store_4,alu_sreg,load_4,store_4,mov_reg")
> (set_attr "pool_range" "*,*,*,*,*,*,*, *,1018,*,*")
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..31061d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "skip override" { *-*-* } { "-mfloat-abi=hard" } { "" } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mpure-code -mcpu=cortex-m23 -march=armv8-m.base -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
> +
> +typedef int __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
> +
> +V v;
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + v += (V){4095};
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c1789da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr94538-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mpure-code" } */
> +
> +typedef int __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
> +
> +V v;
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + v += (V){4095};
> +}
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list