[PATCH] Implement no_stack_protect attribute.

[Martin Liška]

PING^4

On 7/23/20 1:10 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> PING^3
> 
> On 6/24/20 11:09 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> PING^2
>>
>> On 6/10/20 10:12 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> PING^1
>>>
>>> On 5/25/20 3:10 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>> On 5/21/20 4:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>>> On 5/21/20 5:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/18/20 10:37 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>>>>> I know there are some somewhat complex cases the attribute exclusion
>>>>>>> mechanism isn't general enough to handle but this seems simple enough
>>>>>>> that it should work.  Unless I'm missing something that makes it not
>>>>>>> feasible I would suggest to use it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Martin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we have a better place where we check for attribute collision?
>>>>>
>>>>> If by collision you mean the same thing as the mutual exclusion I was
>>>>> talking about then that's done by creating an attribute_spec::exclusions
>>>>> array like for instance attr_cold_hot_exclusions in c-attribs.c and
>>>>> pointing to it from the attribute_spec entries for each of
>>>>> the mutually exclusive attributes in the attribute table.  Everything
>>>>> else is handled automatically by decl_attributes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I'm sending updated version of the patch that utilizes the conflict
>>>> detection.
>>>>
>>>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>>>>
>>>> Ready to be installed?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Martin
>>>
>>
>