PING [Patch][Middle-end]Add -fzero-call-used-regs=[skip|used-gpr|all-gpr|used|all]
Tue Aug 11 17:30:28 GMT 2020
CC’ing Richard for his comments on this.
> On Aug 10, 2020, at 9:39 PM, Alexandre Oliva <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I think that moving how to zeroing the registers part to each target
>> will be a better solution since each target has
>> Better idea on how to use the most efficient insns to do the work.
> It's certainly good to allow machine-specific optimized code sequences,
> but it would certainly be desirable to have a machine-independent
> fallback. It doesn't seem exceedingly hard to loop over the registers
> and emit a (set (reg:M N) (const_int 0)) for each one that is to be
> zeroed out.
The current implementation already includes such machine-independent code, it should be very easy to add this.
Richard, what’s your opinion on this?
Do we need a machine-independent implementation to zeroing the registers for the default when the target does not provide a optimized
More information about the Gcc-patches