RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives

Nathan Sidwell nathan@acm.org
Mon Aug 10 12:58:54 GMT 2020


On 8/10/20 4:48 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>>>>> sure.
>>>>> * develop patch
>>>>> * run testsuite
>>>>> * observe unexpected ICEs
>>>>> * load g++.log into editor
>>>>> * ^sinternal comp
>>>>> * gets to first unexpected ICE
>>>>> * debug it.
>>>>>
>>>>> What does '^sinternal comp' become?  As there could be many expected ICEs
>>>>> it'll be painful to determine whether any particular utterance of 'internal
>>>>> compiler' is expected or not.
>>>>
>>>> That is a problem I don't know how to deal with.  I know how to pass
>>>> additional options to the compiler from dejagnu.  I thought maybe I could use
>>>> -pass-exit-codes, redirect stderr to /dev/null, and check if the exit code is
>>>> ICE_EXIT_CODE, but there seems to be no way to do that redirection.  So I'm
>>>> stuck.
>>>>
>>>> Though, you could just grep for '^FAIL.*internal comp', which will find the
>>>> first unexpected ICE.  Contrary to the expected ICEs, the unexpected ICEs will
>>>> be shown in 'Excess errors:'.  Won't that work?
>>>
>>> Read what I wrote:
>>>>> * load g++.log into editor
>>>>> * ^sinternal comp
>>>
>>> are you telling me not to use an editor for this task?  the search is so one
>>> can get the command line.  Grepping the log file will not do that.
>>
>> No, I'm saying that looking for '^FAIL.*internal comp' (in an editor) instead
>> of just 'internal comp' will get you to the ICEs you care about.  In vim,
>> '/^FAIL.*in' gets me there.
> 
> Yeah, this works.  I'm not sure whether Nathan's ^s is isearch
> or regexp-isearch :-)

It was incremental :) it;s kind of nice just to stop typing when it hits 
the first ICE message!  But, I'm not going to object any more, I guess 
I'll live with it. </grumpy old man>

[I'm sure I can figure out some emacs macro binding to DTRT]

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list