RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives

[Nathan Sidwell]

On 8/6/20 8:01 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 7:01 AM, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> XFAIL: g++.dg/foo.C  -std=c++17 (internal compiler error)
>>> PASS: g++.dg/foo.C  -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
>>> Which one of these would you not like to see?
>>
>> Neither of these is solving the issue.  How do I find the ICES that are unexpected, without tripping over the ICEs that are expected?
> 
> Don't you already have this issue for current xfailed ICEs?  ^FAIL.*internal compiler error I think finds them, doesn't it?


Are there xfailed ICEs?  I've not run into them?

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell