RFC: Monitoring old PRs, new dg directives

Mike Stump mikestump@comcast.net
Fri Aug 7 00:01:48 GMT 2020


On Aug 6, 2020, at 7:01 AM, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
> 
>> XFAIL: g++.dg/foo.C  -std=c++17 (internal compiler error)
>> PASS: g++.dg/foo.C  -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
>> Which one of these would you not like to see?
> 
> Neither of these is solving the issue.  How do I find the ICES that are unexpected, without tripping over the ICEs that are expected?

Don't you already have this issue for current xfailed ICEs?  ^FAIL.*internal compiler error I think finds them, doesn't it?


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list