[PATCH] diagnostics: get_option_html_page fixes

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:31:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-30 at 23:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:18:13PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > Thanks for working on this; sorry for getting these wrong.
> > > 
> > > Is is possible to build gfortran without C and C++?  If so, then if
> > > I'm
> > 
> > It is possible without C++, but not without C.
> > 
> > E.g. --enable-languages=fortran,go will actually enable
> > c,fortran,go,lto.
> >         *,c,*)
> >                 ;;                          
> >         *)                                  
> >                 enable_languages=c,${enable_languages}
> >                 ;;
> > So, strictly speaking the #ifdef CL_C isn't needed there, so if you
> > want,
> > I can drop that #ifdef and only use CL_CXX ifdef.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Perhaps a silly question, but does the patch give the right answers if
> someone does that?  (which I think is equivalent to "Are there any
> options labeled with both Fortran and C++ but not C that are documented
> in gcc/Warning-Options.html"?)

ATM all the -W* options with CL_Fortran in the mask
are either CL_C | CL_CXX | CL_Fortran ... | CL_WARNING,
or CL_Fortran ... | CL_WARNING (not enabled for anything but Fortran)

	Jakub