[PATCH] RTEMS: Improve GCC specification

[Sebastian Huber]

Hello Jeff,

On 08/04/2020 22:24, Jeff Law wrote:

> On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 19:47 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Add a start/end file specification if the -qrtems option is present.
>> Allow targets to customize it.
>>
>> Support the standard -nodefaultlibs option.
>>
>> gcc/
>>
>> 	* config/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Define if undefined.
>> 	(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
>> 	(STARTFILE_SPEC): Update comment.  Add RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC.
>> 	(ENDFILE_SPEC): Add RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC.
>> 	(LIB_SPECS): Support -nodefaultlibs option.
>> 	* config/or1k/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Define.
>> 	(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
>> 	* config/rs6000/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
>> 	(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
>> 	* config/v850/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
>> 	(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
> How important is it to get this into gcc-10?  We're well into stage4 at this
> point and while we do have leeway with a patch like this we do want to be
> selective about what we accept.
>
> If it's important, then OK, otherwise please defer it to gcc-11, where it's pre-
> approved.
would it be all right to commit it to the trunk once the GCC 11 
development starts and then back port it for GCC 10.2 after a while?