[SVE] PR91532

[Prathamesh Kulkarni]

On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
> > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ?
> > Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that
> > will clean up the dead store ?
> I'd hesitate to add another DSE pass.  If there's one nearby could we
> move the existing pass?
Well I think the nearest one is just after pass_warn_restrict. Not
sure if it's a good
idea to move it up from there ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
>
> Jeff